Suspension Cone Problem
#1
Posted 22 May 2012 - 11:13 PM
Decided to replace my knuckle joints, hub bearings and ball joints today, i got the cone compression tool from minispares which suited my car, 1985. started using the tool and it seem very hard to screw it into the cone, so i did it up to the best i could, very tight. i got the trumpet and knuckle joint out but when refitting i had to compress the cone further and then bang!! the thread have been stripped off the tool, so now i got the cone free.
does it sound like the cone thread did not match the tool? also what can i do in this situation? do i get new cones and tool that match for definite?also does the arm have to be removed to remove the cone??
owen
#2
Posted 23 May 2012 - 11:01 AM
You have a serious problem now, because you can't compress the cone to be able to take the arm out safely, to be able to remove the cone. The safest way forward is to saw through the trumpet, at an angle, or use a cold chisel, but you may be able to relieve tension by drilling as many large holes as possible in the cone instead, which will be messy, but as the cone is scrap now it will avoid also having to replace the trumpet.
#3
Posted 23 May 2012 - 01:09 PM
#4
Posted 23 May 2012 - 04:17 PM
The arm pivot is held at one end (back) by a large nut and lockwasher, which you undo. The other end (front) also has a large nut and lockwasher, but you don't need to disturb that. Just take out the two small bolts, and the mounting plate "should" come away complete with the pivot shaft. It may need some careful persuasion. If it is tight, once undone, turn the front main nut clockwise, which will forcibly rotate the mounting plate and shaft, to break any rust or dirt which may be holding it.
I am not entirely surprised that you had the wrong thread on the compressor, if you went by age. It "should" have been correct but I suspect that Rover were using both types of cone for a while, and in any case they are likely to have been replaced by a previous owner, who may have obtained old stock from somewhere. It is a real nuisance, but the only way to tell for sure on a Mini nowadays is to check every part very carefully. A few other bits went metric too, at various times, and not necessarily always.
#5
Posted 23 May 2012 - 04:50 PM
I'm surprised the course metric gave out instead of the fine threads of the doughnut.
It's possible I suppose that the threads are correct and that the tool went in crooked or the doughnut was sat crooked.
I had one go BANG on me a few years ago undercompression. Was the correct thread....but cheap doughnut copies and the nut pulled right through!
#6
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:37 PM
#7
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:48 PM
#8
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:59 PM
#9
Posted 23 May 2012 - 10:08 PM
#10
Posted 23 May 2012 - 10:09 PM
#11
Posted 23 May 2012 - 10:12 PM
#12
Posted 23 May 2012 - 10:13 PM
#13
Posted 24 May 2012 - 05:46 PM
Left: Brand new standard cone from Mini Spares, 92MM heigh.
Middle: Mini Spares red spot cone with a few 100 miles on it, 87MM height.
Right: An old cone from a customers car we fitted new ones to, 80MM heigh.
#14
Posted 25 May 2012 - 09:04 AM
thanks
#15
Posted 25 May 2012 - 11:09 PM
So I can't guarantee to be anywhere near correct, but I would be inclined to check the toeboard subframe mounts first. The rubber invariably separates from the metal after depressingly few miles.
The answer is to fit a full front solid mount kit, all six mounts, to end a maintenance nightmare and sharpen the handling at the same time. Don't ever mix solid and rubber.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











