Or, with some actual facts, this isn't making an example or picking on a soft target. This person, whom none of us knows the history of, has admitted dangerous driving. Which the video undoubtedly shows. The offence carries a mandatory, minimum 1 year driving ban. The judge cannot waive the ban, it's mandatory. The offence carries a mandatory retest. It carries a maximum 2 year jail term which was not applied in favour of community service. The woman actually got off pretty lightly with almost the minimum penalty. Frankly in my opinion she should have gone to jail for a bit, stupid stunt driving in public places should mean jail. She would have been so absorbed in how her mate was doing she would have been paying limited attention to the road, or if she was watching the road she wasn't paying enough attention to what she was doing. Someone pushes a trolley out from behind a pillar, she hits the brakes, oh dear her mate hits the back of her car at 20mph and smashes his head in. Idiocy. The law being too relaxed or badly applied in one instance has no bearing on how it should be applied elsewhere. I think this is completely appropriate.
This.
What if he lost control of his wheelchair and smashed into the side of your mini? Or worse wiped out your infant child. And her attention would have been limited in a place where more attention is needed than anywhere, with young children and cars reversing from bays. I value my license far too much than to prat around like this
Edited by Mini-Mad-Craig, 01 November 2014 - 02:35 PM.