Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Mk1 Vs Later Minis Reliability And Usability


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

#16 surfblue

surfblue

    Camshaft & Stage Two Head

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,826 posts
  • Location: Stuck in the 1980's

Posted 22 September 2018 - 07:15 AM

 

 

if you were to fit a electronic dizzy and pointless fuel pump then a mk1 would be very reliable

 

I had to think about this one for a bit. I was wondering why on earth a fuel pump would be pointless to fit... 

 

the original SU fuel pump uses points ti activate it but you can buy a electronic PC board to replace the points 

 

Didnt know that, worth considering!

Assume it comes as just the board that you replace the points with rather than a whole pump?

Having said that I put an electronic distributor into my Mk1, lasted a couple of years then failed. Whipped it out and put the original dizzy back in along with a new set of points and condensor and it been going fine ever since. Sometimes original is best?



#17 Cooperman

Cooperman

    Uncle Cooperman, Voted Mr TMF 2011

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,039 posts
  • Location: Cambs.
  • Local Club: MCR, HAMOC, Chelmsford M.C.

Posted 22 September 2018 - 09:46 AM

Unless absolute originality is required, I always use a Facit fuel pump. They even make almost the right 'ticking noise'.

Those old Lucas pumps were a nightmare sometimes. I recall laying in the snow one night trying to coax mine to work with the help of a small hammer. 


Edited by Cooperman, 22 September 2018 - 09:49 AM.


#18 Ethel

Ethel

    ..is NOT a girl!

  • TMF Team
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,416 posts
  • Local Club: none

Posted 22 September 2018 - 11:19 AM

 

 

if you were to fit a electronic dizzy and pointless fuel pump then a mk1 would be very reliable

 

I had to think about this one for a bit. I was wondering why on earth a fuel pump would be pointless to fit... 

 

the original SU fuel pump uses points ti activate it but you can buy a electronic PC board to replace the points 

 

 

If the '1964 Mk1' has a remote gear change it may well not be a Mk.1. Does it have external door hinges? The only genuine original Mk.1 998's are all Coopers with rod-change gear selection.

A genuine Mk.1 is a fast-appreciating asset and not really ideal as a daily driver.

The Mk.3 998 is just a nice classic car, but is becoming more collectable as time goes by.

Personally I would not use a old classic as a daily driver for a variety of reasons such as high maintenance needs, ease of being stolen, lack of comfort, safety in modern traffic and spares availability. But if a classic is chosen as a daily then a Mini will work so long as you are prepared to do a lot of maintenance. Many of us used them in the 1960's on a daily basis but I wouldn't want to now.

Min's can make excellent and reliable daily runabouts, but it would be soul destroying watching one deteriorate as a result.



#19 Cooperman

Cooperman

    Uncle Cooperman, Voted Mr TMF 2011

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,039 posts
  • Location: Cambs.
  • Local Club: MCR, HAMOC, Chelmsford M.C.

Posted 22 September 2018 - 12:10 PM

the problem is that any classic Mini, or any other classic really, that is reliable enough for daily use is going to be in good condition. Thus it will have a good value probably over £4000.

For £4000 one can buy a really nice modern car which will require virtually no maintenance, won't develop serious rust ad will have all the modern safety features. The difference in running costs will enable a Mini or another classic to be bought as a classic and restored to be your pride & joy.



#20 mk1leg

mk1leg

    Crazy About Mini's

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,341 posts
  • Location: Jersey
  • Local Club: Mini Club Jersey, MCR

Posted 22 September 2018 - 02:09 PM

http://sucarb.co.uk/...earth-12-v.html






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users