

Cooper Spi & Mpi Differences
#1
Posted 07 August 2009 - 12:19 AM

#2
Posted 07 August 2009 - 12:39 AM
No idea about the performance difference.
#3
Posted 07 August 2009 - 12:43 AM
hope this helps
#4
Posted 07 August 2009 - 01:03 AM
mpi = more injectors = more power than spi in standard form
hope this helps
They are both listed as making 63bhp, the mpi just makes its peak torque 900rpm lower down.
However because the mpi has a 2.76 FD it is slower to accelerate but will cruise at lower engine speeds than the spi when travelling at the
same speed.
#5
Posted 07 August 2009 - 05:29 AM
Incidentally, I think the SPi used two camshaft part numbers and the MPi used a camshaft with a different third part number. No idea about the differences except what was said already about torque. SPi had a heated inlet manifold and got a feeling the MPi didn't - really must go study that MPi lump in my garage haven't looked at it in several years!
#6
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:43 AM
#7
Posted 07 August 2009 - 10:48 AM
mpi = more injectors = more power than spi in standard form
hope this helps
They are both listed as making 63bhp, the mpi just makes its peak torque 900rpm lower down.
However because the mpi has a 2.76 FD it is slower to accelerate but will cruise at lower engine speeds than the spi when travelling at the
same speed.
so hypothetically, if they were both racing each other from a standing start, the Spi would edge it accelerating before the Mpi eventually over taking?
Where would the 1990 Cooper RSP come in all this. Would the carb model handle the pace? What was its stated power output?
Edited by Danuneek, 07 August 2009 - 10:50 AM.
#8
Posted 07 August 2009 - 02:20 PM
mpi = more injectors = more power than spi in standard form
hope this helps
They are both listed as making 63bhp, the mpi just makes its peak torque 900rpm lower down.
However because the mpi has a 2.76 FD it is slower to accelerate but will cruise at lower engine speeds than the spi when travelling at the
same speed.
so hypothetically, if they were both racing each other from a standing start, the Spi would edge it accelerating before the Mpi eventually over taking?
Where would the 1990 Cooper RSP come in all this. Would the carb model handle the pace? What was its stated power output?
rsp would be quicker (if its was running well), i think im right in thinking its a metro lump in them?
id say SPI's are alot simpler than MPIs and easier to modify. aperantly the mpi's run alot smoother tho.
#9
Posted 07 August 2009 - 10:26 PM
Other difference's are
Mpi's have side impact bars in the doors and rear quarters
have wider windsreen seals and laminated front screens
also have airbags dont think the spi's did i may be wrong?
and also they had 13 inch wheels well the sportspack versions did
#10
Posted 08 August 2009 - 12:28 AM
PS. I dont know why I'm so fascinated with this

Edited by Danuneek, 08 August 2009 - 12:30 AM.
#11
Posted 08 August 2009 - 01:46 AM
Since when?Mpi's have side impact bars in the doors and rear quarters
Oh and, IF you get a problem with your MPi they're a pain in the !@#? to fix! Yay for carbs!
#12
Posted 08 August 2009 - 02:03 AM
I reckon: 1st place RSP, 2nd place SPi, 3rd place MPi.Okay, if it was from a standing start, a quarter mile, who would win out of a standard MPI, SPI and RSP Cooper?
RSP engine slightly less power at 60 bhp but the engines came from the MG Metro and had the shortest FD ratio with 3.1:1. I'd place the RSP ahead of the SPi and MPi because of those reasons. Comparing the SPi and MPi both had 63 bhp output although MPi had slightly better torque curve than the SPi it also weighs more than the SPi and had a longer FD ratio, so I'd place it behind the SPi.
I guess it also depends what moods they're in on the day!

Edited by Lot, 08 August 2009 - 02:04 AM.
#13
Posted 08 August 2009 - 07:53 PM
Since when?Mpi's have side impact bars in the doors and rear quarters
Oh and, IF you get a problem with your MPi they're a pain in the !@#? to fix! Yay for carbs!
Since 1997

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users