
Replacing The Mechanical Fan With An Electrical One
#1
Posted 23 February 2010 - 09:34 PM
cheers
Andy
#2
Posted 03 March 2010 - 08:30 PM
#3
Posted 03 March 2010 - 08:35 PM

#4
Posted 04 March 2010 - 10:43 AM
#5
Posted 04 March 2010 - 11:16 AM
run both
dont know if you 'need' mechanical fan with a kenlowe, but I've always seen the kenlowe as an addition rather than replacement.
Yup, I've seen them being added to the inner wing side of the radiator.
Would be nice to add an inline switch (can get original Kenlowe ones) as its nice to have more control IMO.
#6
Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:19 PM
the mpi doesnt have a fan just the rad and an electrical fan so should in theory be ok
#7
Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:26 PM
yep advert still says same thing
http://www.kenlowe.c...mers/index.html
#8
Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:32 PM
Kenlowe adverts used to claim better mpg and power years ago not seen latest, working on the theory the Kenlowe replaces the mechanical, and the mechanical adds to the resistance the engine is having to fight.
yep advert still says same thing
http://www.kenlowe.c...mers/index.html
isnt that based upon front mounted applications - not necessarily the transverse A series ?
kenlowe also point out in their bumpf:
VISCOUS OR FIXED ENGINE DRIVEN FANS often need a KENLOWE booster fan mounted in front of the radiator to force feed the engine fan to increase the exit volume of air from the radiator or address areas of the radiator not efficiently cooled by the engine fan.
they never specifically say its a replacement ......

#9
Posted 04 March 2010 - 09:09 PM
#10
Posted 04 March 2010 - 09:34 PM
I tried this and can say that the electric fan on a side rad doesn't work on a road car. It's not quite enough, it just kept creeping up even when going along at 60.
Dave
#11
Posted 05 March 2010 - 01:30 PM
practicality beats theory every time
case closed
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users