
Camshaft Advice For 1380 Hillclimber
#1
Posted 28 April 2010 - 01:02 PM
My first post to the mini forum, but been here for years. If i get something wrong, dont be shy, let me know.
I’m Needing some advice on the mad world of Cam shafts.
I’m currently running a very old 649 cam in 1380 race engine and i want to change it for two reasons. Firstly, and Predictably, more hp, and secondly, I want to fit a new competition oil pump and the 649 wont drive it.
Here’s the spec. I run this engine in a hillclimb mini on 8 inch avon slicks, carbon front end, rear sub frame replaced with beam, lightened everything etc., so speed is the only thing that matters here.
I’m offset boring a new a+ block for 73.5 omega pistons. Carb is a 48 dellorto twin choke. Steel crank, lightened steel flywheel, comp clutch and straight cut jack knight box. All the bits. The head is a 5 port from Brian Slark with alot of work done to it, big valves and hardened standard a+ rockers.
This engine is limited to 8500 rpm, which it does without problem. I’ve been studying David Vizard’s bible (3rd ed) and I’ve read a bit about scatter pattern cams but my brain is melting with LCA, CR, overlap, and all the maths.
Could you recommend a cam profile that would suit this engine, and help me frighten some of the guys in my class with 16v’s.
any advice greatly appreciated and thanks in advance for your time guys.
Cheers
#2
Posted 28 April 2010 - 02:26 PM
There is an interesting thread on TM at the moment about cams click the request is not for a hillclimber, but some interesting thoughts. Look at what Paul Wiggington says, I can't think of a faster 1380 mini, not sure what cam he has though, you could ask him, he visits here sometimes.
Edited by Wil_h, 28 April 2010 - 02:28 PM.
#3
Posted 28 April 2010 - 02:38 PM
I'd also recommend talking with a guy here in Australia... Graham Russell. He has done extensive R&D on mini camshafts... GR's Website
Keep us all updated on your progress

#4
Posted 28 April 2010 - 04:17 PM
As for cam, although I am told I am wrong, a super sprint would be my choice. Unfortuately, probably only regrinds are available now and that might cause them not to work.
#5
Posted 28 April 2010 - 09:02 PM
I personally would be looking further into a scatter pattern cam, this will give you a better spread of power.
#6
Posted 28 April 2010 - 10:06 PM
I have a SuperSprint Cam in my 970 motor, and while they do scream along, apparently the 649 is generally a better cam, especially where torque is required on a hillclimb car.
I personally would be looking further into a scatter pattern cam, this will give you a better spread of power.
According to Longman, the super sprint will not work in the 970 engine.
#7
Posted 28 April 2010 - 10:21 PM

Edited by mini-man-dan, 28 April 2010 - 10:21 PM.
#8
Posted 28 April 2010 - 11:58 PM
I have a SuperSprint Cam in my 970 motor, and while they do scream along, apparently the 649 is generally a better cam, especially where torque is required on a hillclimb car.
I personally would be looking further into a scatter pattern cam, this will give you a better spread of power.
According to Longman, the super sprint will not work in the 970 engine.
Interesting - I had not seen that said before. It worked, but I reckon more power can be unleashed by others. Where did you read that from Longman?
#9
Posted 29 April 2010 - 01:24 AM
I have a SuperSprint Cam in my 970 motor, and while they do scream along, apparently the 649 is generally a better cam, especially where torque is required on a hillclimb car.
I personally would be looking further into a scatter pattern cam, this will give you a better spread of power.
According to Longman, the super sprint will not work in the 970 engine.
Interesting - I had not seen that said before. It worked, but I reckon more power can be unleashed by others. Where did you read that from Longman?
didn't read it, he told me.
#10
Posted 29 April 2010 - 05:40 AM
I have a SuperSprint Cam in my 970 motor, and while they do scream along, apparently the 649 is generally a better cam, especially where torque is required on a hillclimb car.
I personally would be looking further into a scatter pattern cam, this will give you a better spread of power.
According to Longman, the super sprint will not work in the 970 engine.
Interesting - I had not seen that said before. It worked, but I reckon more power can be unleashed by others. Where did you read that from Longman?
didn't read it, he told me.
What cam did he recommend for a full race 970?
#11
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:17 AM
What cam did he recommend for a full race 970?
He didn't, we were discussing cams for 1275s and while recommending a SS, he said they didn't work in 970s.
#12
Posted 29 April 2010 - 01:22 PM
I'm the guy started this great cam debate. just had an email from del at Kent cams, he reckons a 296 scatter pattern would suit my spec, up to 8000 rpm.
He didnt give a price but this is a pretty aggressive cam, no? anyone got experience with this one. From what i can determine, i really need 1.5 high lift roller rockers to get the best out of this type of cam. startin to get expensive now.
Thanks for all the info, it all helps.
#14
Posted 30 April 2010 - 01:17 AM
#15
Posted 30 April 2010 - 01:39 AM
I believe Guessworks on here runs a 296, PM him and see what he says about it, if i remember correctly, he was a fan!Hi guys
I'm the guy started this great cam debate. just had an email from del at Kent cams, he reckons a 296 scatter pattern would suit my spec, up to 8000 rpm.
He didnt give a price but this is a pretty aggressive cam, no? anyone got experience with this one. From what i can determine, i really need 1.5 high lift roller rockers to get the best out of this type of cam. startin to get expensive now.
Thanks for all the info, it all helps.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users