Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Look At The Wear On These Con-rod Shells.


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#16 wile e coyote

wile e coyote

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,230 posts
  • Location: North Somerset

Posted 23 July 2010 - 12:39 PM

On the brightside theres no particulate scoring on either main or big ends, the crank float as measured is a little on the high side but no serious issue - the mix and match thrust solution was used on my engine and it's fine... what strikes as odd (and Im using a small screen so tricky to see is apparent localised discolouration on the main at the bottom left? - However when all's said and done I note that the engine had no evident problems before strip down so after a few judicious measurements and thrust change to compensate wear evident and natural owner paranioa - pop in a new set of shells.....

#17 Sprocket

Sprocket

    Great on Injection faults

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,266 posts
  • Location: Warrington
  • Local Club: Manchester Minis

Posted 23 July 2010 - 07:07 PM

That big end bearing wear is peculiar to crank flex. As the crank flexes the big ends nip up. The wear on the main bearings might support this theory, which is why I keep saying to measure all bearing clearances. on a meduim to high mileage car, anything over 0.0025" clearance is going to wear the bearings at a higher rate. If the crank is allowed to move in the bearings its flex increases. Total failure of the center main bearing can see the crank flex more than enough to allow the pistons to touch the head.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users