
Minisport Cones Cheaper Than Minispares...why?
#1
Posted 03 March 2011 - 10:16 PM
they both look the same in the pics and both say genuine?
#2
Posted 03 March 2011 - 10:18 PM
#3
Posted 03 March 2011 - 10:29 PM
I personally would stick with the Mini Spares type, at £6.00 more than the others per spring the are not that much more. As important to the safety and quality of the spring as the way the rubber is cast and cooled is the design of the metal parts and the way they are bonded to the rubber, it's a patented process and Mini Spares springs are produced to that patent.
Or if you want to go non genuine, the Mini Spares red spot springs are absolutely excellent on a road car and give fantastic results IMHO.
#4
Posted 03 March 2011 - 10:34 PM
i did wonder why there was a price diffrence for apparent "genuine" products
id rather have the more expensive ones if there safer and will last longer.
thanks mate
#5
Posted 03 March 2011 - 10:41 PM
I would call then and see what's up. If they are marked Dunlop and/or Moulton on the rubber.....are they not genuine?
#6
Posted 03 March 2011 - 10:47 PM
What he can't do however, is make the same springs he designed for BMC all those years ago or use the same processes. Because they are patented, when he designed them he did so for BMC and they own the rights, so now BMW own the rights. So the Mini Spares springs are to the genuine design.
Although thinking about it the patent must have expired by now.
#7
Posted 03 March 2011 - 10:47 PM
Minispares may be producing them from the original tools but there is still alot of genuine stock on traders shelves
#8
Posted 03 March 2011 - 10:52 PM

Regards Blue
#9
Posted 03 March 2011 - 10:54 PM
#10
Posted 04 March 2011 - 08:54 AM
#11
Posted 04 March 2011 - 09:00 AM
#12
Posted 04 March 2011 - 09:16 AM
They never have any in bloody stock.
#13
Posted 04 March 2011 - 10:02 AM
I have been told of Genuine "Rover" cones only lasting a few thousand miles, as they were made for a "softer ride" and were so compressed they couldn't get them out of the subframe turrets
Yes Rover and BMW successively tried to make the springs softer, but also the quality of the manufacturing process had slipped which is what caused the early settlement and hardening. The rubber wasn't being made right. That's why Mini Spares went back to basics with the manufacturer and reworked their production. I use Mini Spares' own red spot springs rather than standard ones, which are made to a proper rubber casting and cooling method and they are lasting just fine. If they have got their standard ones up to the same quality, they'll last well I'd imagine. Don't know what hardness their standard springs are made to though. Incidentally the standard spring hardness changes continuously over the years, it wasn't just the later cars that had different grades. They never gave any type a different part number though. They were made quite soft towards the end of production largely because of the immense weight of the twin pont, which was over 100kg heavier than early cars. This is what crushes the poorly made springs early too.
#14
Posted 04 March 2011 - 10:09 AM

#15
Posted 04 March 2011 - 10:48 AM
I thought Avon ones were the ones to get, as they were the only genuine ones, hence why I got the Minisport ones, as they say they are Avon.
Also, saying :
Each batch of cones is tested by Moulton Developments to guarantee the quality and consistency of each cones is to the exact standard and formula finalised in 1959.
Surely they must be genuine, I mean, if they're not, then they're due a massive lawsuit.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users