Jump to content


Photo

Cat A Write-Off?


  • Please log in to reply
38 replies to this topic

#1 Se7enS1ns

Se7enS1ns

    Speeding Along Now

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 472 posts
  • Location: Bradford

Posted 29 September 2011 - 01:40 PM

So I’ve just had a phonecall from my dad on behalf of "some bloke" for some advice that is beyond the extent of my knowledge, so said I’d ask on here instead. This is third-hand, so please excuse the inaccuracies or vagueness of details;

Ok so this guy has a mini, model unknown to me but pretty tidy by all accounts - or was! A few weeks ago when the wind was pretty bad, the cast iron drainpipe on the side of his house fell off, and landed on his mini. By all accounts, the damage is pretty severe, crushed the roof rail and B-post pretty badly, and the A and C posts have been pulled inwards too. He then had a bit of a ‘mare with the insurance companies (both home insurance and car insurance pointing fingers at one another). The end result is that his car insurance have paid out, but deemed the vehicle to be a Category A write-off due to “serious and excessive structural damage”. The car has been retained on the salvage retention element of his insurance, so he thought about reshelling it.

He has been informed that he can’t do this as the vehicle identity is recorded as a Cat A, which apparently is not allowed to be on the road again, ever, regardless of repair? Is this true? If so, what are his options other than stripping it and buying a full mini and transferring bits over, or is that the only option?

#2 Shifty

Shifty

    Sponsored by Fosters (tm)

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,128 posts
  • Name: Sean
  • Location: Shropshire(sunny)
  • Local Club: TMF

Posted 29 September 2011 - 01:46 PM

As far as I'm aware that car is now for parts only.

#3 R1minimagic

R1minimagic

    Up Into Fourth

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,658 posts
  • Location: Manchester

Posted 29 September 2011 - 01:47 PM

Cat A cannot go back on the road again and i dont think you are allowed to use parts off it either.

#4 Se7enS1ns

Se7enS1ns

    Speeding Along Now

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 472 posts
  • Location: Bradford

Posted 29 September 2011 - 01:50 PM

Yeah that pretty much rings true with what he's been informed. Shame as it only the shell that's taken a beating, interior, subframes and engine are all fine by all accounts. Guessing he'll just buy a rolling shell then maybe and swap everything over.

#5 Sam14

Sam14

    TMF Mug

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,221 posts
  • Location: Mark, Somerset

Posted 29 September 2011 - 02:00 PM

He can just scrape the shell and Sort out the V5 with the dvla and destroy reg plates and he would have to buy another mini unfortunately, Shame it was home insurance they wouldnt of written the car off :P

#6 Scallywag630

Scallywag630

    Up Into Fourth

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,850 posts

Posted 29 September 2011 - 02:02 PM

I'm surprised he was allowed to keep it. This is from an insurance web site:

Insurance Loss Categories - Quick reference
* Category A - Must be crushed. All of it.
* Category B - Vehicle may not be returned to road but parts may be sold.
* Category C - Repairable. Significant damage. Cost of the repair is more than book value of vehicle at dealer rates.
* Category D - Repairable. Probably non-structural damage. May have been economic to repair, but insurer doesn't want to.
* Category X - Repairable. Minor Damage

Category AThe vehicle may not be resold it must be crushed. Severely damaged, total burnout or flood damage with no serviceable parts, or already a stripped out shell. DVLA will require a Notification of Destruction.

Edited by Scallywag630, 29 September 2011 - 02:04 PM.


#7 AndyMiniMad.

AndyMiniMad.

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,290 posts
  • Location: Under The Bonnet.

Posted 29 September 2011 - 02:17 PM

I would tell him to get in touch with the insurance company and ask for it to be reclassified.. No way it should have been a cat A write off. And thats not just me being a biased mini fan...It should have the option to be re shelled.

#8 Se7enS1ns

Se7enS1ns

    Speeding Along Now

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 472 posts
  • Location: Bradford

Posted 29 September 2011 - 02:44 PM

Yeah Cat A does sound drastic. I'm surprised they let him keep it on salvage retention then if he's not even allowed to strip it as per above!

#9 JakeJakeJake

JakeJakeJake

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 836 posts

Posted 29 September 2011 - 03:09 PM

Usually Cat A write offs are a lot more gruesome

#10 Se7enS1ns

Se7enS1ns

    Speeding Along Now

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 472 posts
  • Location: Bradford

Posted 29 September 2011 - 03:22 PM

I dont know much about it, I've not even seen the car persoanlly, but I'm guessin it was categorised as A due to 3 separate structural points being affected, 4 if you include the roof seam its self. Apparently the roof seam is as low as the lower window frame at its worst point, with the B post folded in half.

#11 minidream94

minidream94

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,233 posts

Posted 29 September 2011 - 03:26 PM

Even if it has been written off as a CAT A, he has the car, get it stripped NOW before they take it and crush it

#12 Se7enS1ns

Se7enS1ns

    Speeding Along Now

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 472 posts
  • Location: Bradford

Posted 29 September 2011 - 03:34 PM

Well this is the thing, "they" aren't going to take it and crush it, they've left that responsibility to him to sort out, still has the logbook and everything!

#13 minidream94

minidream94

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,233 posts

Posted 29 September 2011 - 03:38 PM

OO fair enough, ummm thats weird then because they should have taken it and crushed it :/

#14 Se7enS1ns

Se7enS1ns

    Speeding Along Now

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 472 posts
  • Location: Bradford

Posted 29 September 2011 - 03:47 PM

Yeah maybe, not sure how it works in that respect when you've got salvage retention.

#15 Ethel

Ethel

    ..is NOT a girl!

  • TMF Team
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,379 posts
  • Local Club: none

Posted 29 September 2011 - 04:27 PM

Sounds highly iffy. Cat A's are usually "emotionally sensitive" i.e. someone died and the rellies don't want to be reminded by seeing the car back on the road, or hazardous to repair i.e. fire damaged. Hard to see how this qualifies, and equally irresponsible of the insurers to mark it as a hazard without taking responsibility for the disposal.

But it does sound like the only legitimate way to get it back on the road would be a brand new heritage shell, if they changed it to cat C.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users