
Question(S) About Rocker Geometry
#1
Posted 11 November 2011 - 05:26 AM
Thanks!
#2
Posted 11 November 2011 - 08:09 AM
i think the valve lift and effectively the ratio itself can be affected by these spacers, get it wrong and the benefits are lost.
(as i say im not entirely sure on all this so im waiting to see what replies you get as i want to kow myself!)
#3
Posted 11 November 2011 - 09:22 AM
So you need to raise the rockers ( or use shorter custom pushrods ) to offset the height difference.... otherwise you may find you run out of adjustment on screws, or the roller tips may actually come off the top of the valve on full compression.
#4
Posted 11 November 2011 - 09:24 AM
#5
Posted 11 November 2011 - 09:26 AM
If you think about it you'll get more valve opening with the rocker moving through the horizontal, rather than above or below that point.
So not like this
http://www.britishca...of P1010496.JPG
But like this
http://www.britishca...of P1010530.JPG
IMO the spacers should only be needed if you have very long valve stems or massively recessed valves. If it was supplied as a kit I'd have thought that the supplier should be able to tell you whether you need them or not. I presume that they know what valves they have fitted etc.
Edited by Wil_h, 11 November 2011 - 09:28 AM.
#6
Posted 11 November 2011 - 10:12 AM
#7
Posted 11 November 2011 - 10:29 AM
by the way, I've never agreed with adjusting the rocker geometry owing to head or block skimming. I'f there is not enough adjustment in the rockers then you should get the appropriate length pushrods.
#8
Posted 11 November 2011 - 12:25 PM
http://www.google.co...=1t:429,r:0,s:0
like this
http://www.google.co...=1t:429,r:0,s:0
I'd say the rocker should really be "level" half way through the valve travel to get maximum lift with minimum side
load.
What's the other spline nut (not the S big end one) been pinched off do you reckon?
#9
Posted 11 November 2011 - 02:08 PM
You'd need to sit down and work it out, but I'm sure someone already has.
#10
Posted 11 November 2011 - 02:27 PM
It's best to get the rocker shaft horizontal at about 10% to 20% into the lift opening. The lift is unaltered as is the total amount of opening, and the power difference won't really be noticed. it's really about leverage loading.
With, say, a 12G295 head on a 998 it could be that the head has to be skimmed a lot, say 0.080". In that case rocker pillar spacers could well be needed.
Best thing is to do a trial build with an old head gasket and see what it all looks like when assembled. If you ae not changing the cam at this point it's highly unlikely that you'll need roacker shaft spacers.
#11
Posted 11 November 2011 - 02:54 PM
Best thing is to do a trial build with an old head gasket and see what it all looks like when assembled. If you ae not changing the cam at this point it's highly unlikely that you'll need roacker shaft spacers.
I've still got the stock cam installed. So my plan is to put it together with out the spacers. Then I'll set my tappets and see how everything measures out?
#12
Posted 11 November 2011 - 03:15 PM
#13
Posted 11 November 2011 - 03:58 PM
Skimming just a few thou off the head won't make much difference in rocker geometry terms, but with a very high lift cam and higher ratio rockers it can be a geometry issue.
It's best to get the rocker shaft horizontal at about 10% to 20% into the lift opening. The lift is unaltered as is the total amount of opening, and the power difference won't really be noticed. it's really about leverage loading.
With, say, a 12G295 head on a 998 it could be that the head has to be skimmed a lot, say 0.080". In that case rocker pillar spacers could well be needed.
Best thing is to do a trial build with an old head gasket and see what it all looks like when assembled. If you ae not changing the cam at this point it's highly unlikely that you'll need roacker shaft spacers.
Peter is largely correct (yet again)

With a 998 engine i had the stock cam installed. Then i fitted a 12g295 cooper head and found that because of the amount it had been skimmed i could not fit my 1.3.1 roller rockers. THis occurred because i was unable to set the clearances because they were too tight and the con rods were fouling on the rocker arms.
You will soon find out if you NEED the spacers because you will not be able to set the clearances.
You will know if you COULD DO WITH the spacers by looking at the information above
Notice the difference

Jesus
#14
Posted 11 November 2011 - 06:58 PM
So would I have a problem if I fit the spacers when I don't actually need them?
#15
Posted 11 November 2011 - 07:10 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users