Resistive White Wire
#1
Posted 23 November 2011 - 09:06 PM
#2
Posted 23 November 2011 - 09:17 PM
Edited by oliver122, 23 November 2011 - 09:25 PM.
#3
Posted 23 November 2011 - 10:38 PM
Edited by firefox, 23 November 2011 - 10:38 PM.
#4
Posted 24 November 2011 - 12:46 AM
In Lucas wiring schemes, the white wires are unfused wires that are live when the ignition switch is turned on. White wires are full 12V, non-resistive wires.
#5
Posted 24 November 2011 - 12:55 AM
Tim.
#6
Posted 24 November 2011 - 09:04 AM
I am not 100% but i think depending on the type and year of car the ballast resited wire is knocked down to 9V that is why if you put a 12 coil on you have to run a 12 volt new cable from the fuse box to the live terminalAs Firefox said, pink/white is the color of the resistive wire.
In Lucas wiring schemes, the white wires are unfused wires that are live when the ignition switch is turned on. White wires are full 12V, non-resistive wires.
#7
Posted 24 November 2011 - 10:12 AM
#8
Posted 24 November 2011 - 10:52 AM
#9
Posted 24 November 2011 - 11:28 AM
#10
Posted 24 November 2011 - 12:48 PM
Coated? How does coating alter the resistance?
A Copper wire coated in a different type of metal, has a different resistances.
That does not change the resistance of the copper wire.
#11
Posted 24 November 2011 - 02:14 PM
I also want to point this out again as I do in EVERY ballast ignition thread. There is NO voltage drop across the pink wire until current is flowing. What does this mean? It means that there must be an earth connection on coil (-) (either the points are closed or the ignition module is "conducting").
If the points are open and you put a meter between earth and coil (+) (where the pink wire connects) you will find full battery voltage (i.e. 12V). Close the points and repeat the measurement and you will measure between 6V to 9V. Current MUST be flowing through a resistive element for that element to experience a voltage drop.
#12
Posted 24 November 2011 - 06:21 PM
However, the ballast ignition system is not that complicated and it does provide a starting benefit. If you already have a ballast ignition system there is a less expensive work-around than converting the coil type. Visit your local auto parts store and ask them for an external ballast resistor (1.2 to 1.5 Ohm) along with its mounting bracket, buy some crimp terminals, and a length of white 16 AWG (1.3 to 1.6 mm squared) hook up wire.
Remove the pink wire from the ignition switch and from the coil (+) terminal. Run the new white wire from the ignition switch to the engine compartment. Connect the engine compartment end of the white wire to the new ballast resistor. Run a short white wire from the other side of the ballast resistor to the coil (+) terminal. Mount the resistor somewhere out of the way where nothing will touch its exposed terminals. You have now replaced the resistance wire with a ballast resistor.
Once you do this, the ballast ignition system will function as before but little to no heat will be generated inside the loom. The ballast resistor and wires will cost less than a new coil and you have retained the easy starting function.
#13
Posted 25 November 2011 - 05:18 AM
BMC/BL/Rover used the ballast ignition system on cars (prior to electronic ignition) to help cars start easier. Remove it if you want it is a personal choice.
#14
Posted 25 November 2011 - 01:14 PM
Of note is that many of the TR models did not use the pink wire but had the external ballast resistor I mentioned above. My Spitfire for example has the external ballast resistor. The Spitfire is much easier to start in cold weather than our GT6 which has a standard ignition system.
I would not consider a ballast ignition system to be a fashion statement. BL was not known for putting things on a car that they could do without. Nor would I consider my support for the ballast ignition system a "love affair". I simply look at the price of the components (about $45 for a Bosch Blue coil) vs about $10 for a ballast resistor... and choose the least expensive "repair" that will keep the engine running. I don't understand why anyone would recommend throwing away or replacing a functional coil of any type.
#15
Posted 25 November 2011 - 03:53 PM
It was a fashion thing doug, everyone else was fitting 'em so rover did as well. Only they 'bodged' it with that ******* stupid wire.
It was not a fashion thing at all. I well recall the difficulties cars had in the 1960s starting on cold damp mornings, particularly with the dizzy exposed at the front on Minis and 1100s. Triumph Spitfires migrated from a separate resistor to the resistance wire as my 1500 has the wire. It has never given any trouble in the 32 years I have had the car.
Nowadays there is less of a problem with starting if electronic ignition is fitted.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users