
Can You Put An 850 Head And Gbox On A 1098 Bolck?
#1
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:15 PM
#2
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:18 PM
Im not a head man myself thou


#3
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:30 PM
Gearbox would fit OK.
Engine would not breathe very well as the 850 valves are very small.
#4
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:44 PM
the volume of the combustion chambers enlarged as necessary to suit the larger compressed volume per cylinder.
thank you :) what do you mean above? do you (for want of a better phase) 'bore out' the chambers in the head. also i gess you could port and polish it to improve the breathing?
#5
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:47 PM
#6
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:50 PM
#7
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:59 PM
Edited by Cooperman, 13 April 2012 - 09:01 PM.
#8
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:02 PM
It is VERY important to get the compression ratio correct. If you think about it like this you'll better understand: when the piston moves from bottom to top, the mixture in the cylinder and head is being squeezed into the head chamber. So an 850 will be squeezing a swept volume of only 212.5 cc into the head. With a 1098 engine, the swept volume being squeezed will be 274.5 cc. So the head chamber volume on a 1098 head will be much bigger. To fit an 850 head would require grinding out several cc's from each chamber. The time taken to do this will be several hours and each chamber must be exactly the same volume. If you can do this yourself it's fine, but to pay someone would cost several hundred pounds. If you just fit an 850 head onto a 1098 the CR will be so high that you'll probably get 'detonation' and break the pistons! Again, you can't build engines using guessing. You need engineering measuring and machining.
ok thank you. same problemm for a 998 head as well i gess? would low comp pistons help?
Edited by dennismini93, 13 April 2012 - 09:04 PM.
#9
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:09 PM
Whatever you do when building an engine with non-original parts you should always measure & check the CR.
#10
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:49 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users