Valve Springs For 649 Camshaft
#1
Posted 07 July 2012 - 03:17 PM
just a quick question, what valve springs will i need if i run a ST 649 camshaft?
i know they have to be be matched to the cam to stop valve bounce etc but have no idea what ones i need:P
cheers!
#2
Posted 07 July 2012 - 03:54 PM
#3
Posted 07 July 2012 - 04:51 PM
well, this is the thing, i know what i want, but dont know how to get it really
i want to use 35mm inlet and 30mm exhaust valves, will these be the best option? i dont want to offset the valve guides so is this the best sizes to use?
i am building the engine to be able to reach the rev range that the 649 is 'on cam' for, so the engine will rev higher than 7000, 8500 should be the red line
#4
Posted 07 July 2012 - 04:59 PM
#5
Posted 07 July 2012 - 06:13 PM
been working my sock off around school ( and now college) and every penny has gone to this over two years, probably spent 200 pound not on minis in that two years!!
MED race crank, bladed, wedged and balanced, ultralight flywheel, back plate and then balanced as a unit. centre main strap, race bearings, uprated pushrods ( thinking about carbon ones?)
ok thanks. i have seen companys sell 240 lb springs, if a 649 cam only needs 180 lb what cam would need that higher poundage?
and whats coil bound? never heard that term
#6
Posted 07 July 2012 - 06:19 PM
#7
Posted 07 July 2012 - 09:34 PM
#8
Posted 07 July 2012 - 09:44 PM
#9
Posted 07 July 2012 - 10:28 PM
hmm, shame about the carbon rods, spose they would have been mega bucks anyway..
i was going to run the 649 with higher ratio rockers at a later date anyway ( just want to get the engine running now), been talking to oldskool tuners about the 649 and they said it had a great profile but for out and out performance, it didnt really have enough lift. unfortunately i didnt ask them about what springs would be good for it.
#10
Posted 07 July 2012 - 10:47 PM
The best valve springs ive found are swiftunes race springs. The only ones that stopped the valve in my 1293 bouncing above 7500rpm.
#11
Posted 07 July 2012 - 10:59 PM
ok, il check them out, thanks! :)
#12
Posted 07 July 2012 - 11:35 PM
#13
Posted 08 July 2012 - 09:17 AM
but why are high lift rockers a bad idea?? i know that its better to put a cam in because you get the whole different profile of valve overlap instead of just more lift, but the cam im using needs a bit more lift to work to its full advantage.
#14
Posted 08 July 2012 - 09:38 AM
#15
Posted 08 July 2012 - 09:56 AM
now looking at the cam profile it will peak at 8000, so the cam would be on its way out at 8500, bt still, judging by what you are saying im going to need something pretty strong..
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











