Hello everyone,
I was wondering, what is the ideal ratio for a standard stroked 1275? I have seen 6" con-rods on the market, which I could include in my next build. With improving the ratio, would there be a noticeable improvement in power or less wear on the bores and pistons? In addition, are there any downsides to the use of the mandatory shorter pistons in a fast road motor? Any info will be much appreciated. Thanks..
Curtis
1275: Stroke/rod Length Ratio
Started by
Curtis Brown
, Aug 14 2012 09:00 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 14 August 2012 - 09:00 PM
#2
Posted 15 August 2012 - 05:18 PM
...
#3
Posted 15 August 2012 - 05:51 PM
I think more info on your build is necessary. What is a 'standard' stroked 1275. If it is standard then it will be standard bore & stroke.
#4
Posted 15 August 2012 - 08:43 PM
By standard stroke, I mean 81.3 mm. The rest of the engine will not be though. I am planning on a SC 7 port but I have not decided on a cam yet. Although I did not think the engine spec would affect the pro's/con's of improving the stroke/rod ratio.
#5
Posted 15 August 2012 - 08:55 PM
Increasing the rod lengh from stock on your stroke would increase the given compression reading figure due to a longer dwell around TDC. The fuel we have now is shockingly bad for the A-series. I would suggest if you try a longer rod, you will need to reduce the static compression to compensate at the fuel will detonate easier for a given compression. This ia already a problem in the A-series so I would not try to make it worse!!
see here for more info;
http://www.stahlhead..._Rod Length.htm
AC
see here for more info;
http://www.stahlhead..._Rod Length.htm
AC
#6
Posted 15 August 2012 - 11:25 PM
The longer rods will presumably also be heavier...... why do you want to make this change ? You would need special (no doubt v expensive) pistons too.....
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











