http://www.ebay.co.u...=item460877532b
to lock the seat down manually as i dont want to spend a fortune on new subframes for them. what are the rules regards to MOT and seat restraint ? and would it pass with these working ?
cheers
Posted 17 November 2012 - 09:22 PM
Posted 17 November 2012 - 09:26 PM
Edited by charie t, 17 November 2012 - 09:28 PM.
Posted 17 November 2012 - 09:29 PM
Posted 17 November 2012 - 09:43 PM
Posted 17 November 2012 - 09:54 PM
ive already seen something like this and thanks for the link to VOSA'S manuals and i think its literally is going to be to the discretion of the tester and if he were to view it to have significantly reduced. which as far as i can see as long as its locked and secure, the locking system isn't scrutinized as how it works as long as it does.
Posted 17 November 2012 - 10:14 PM
Posted 17 November 2012 - 10:17 PM
Posted 17 November 2012 - 10:27 PM
Posted 17 November 2012 - 10:47 PM
Posted 17 November 2012 - 11:18 PM
it has runners so seats slide forward and back just the debate on fixing them in place when driving so as i say if i were to crash fingers crossed not the seat stays static and does not follow momentum forward and cause me injury. and then simply unclip to let people in back aand clip down again to drive.Hi,
I assist with MOT testing and as far as i know the seat has to be secure to the floor (it doesnt say how it has to be secure, just secure) BUT as of earlier this year if the car seat was designed to have sliding fore and arft movement then it MUST work.
I guess by fitting these rubber straps it would stop the forward and backward movement of the seat??
Regards
The testers manual says,
Check that the backrests of all seats (front and rear) can be secured in their normal upright position.
I understand this to refer to seats which have a tilting or reclining mechanism usually released by a handle or lever and refers to the seat back only, not the base. Minis up to Mk3 and many other 2 door cars of the era all had seats which tilted forward but did not lock, to allow access th the back. The manual had a note saying that " original design characteristics should be accepted"
The tester may consider that the security of the seat may be a fail if the lock down mechanism is missing or inadequate.
The security of the driver’s or any passenger’s seat is significantly reduced.
Frankly, considering the fact that BMC thought the original Mini seats were secure enough without a lock down mechanism, then I would pass your seats with a possible advisory. In my opinion the wording in the manual is open to misinterpretation and needs to be studied carefully. At the end of the day it's going to be down to how your tester sees it. Best plan as always is to nip round to your test station before the test and ask what they think.
Posted 17 November 2012 - 11:35 PM
Posted 17 November 2012 - 11:56 PM
Posted 18 November 2012 - 12:07 AM
£5.00 rubber straps + crash = smashed in face, teeth knocked out, jaw wired etc...
£80.00 secure subframes + crash = bit of a saw shoulder from the seatbelt.
i know what one i'd go for
Posted 18 November 2012 - 12:18 AM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users