
Cam Shaft Help
#1
Posted 06 January 2013 - 02:11 PM
Which cam should I use? I want to build a farly quick engine but I want it to be driveable. Should I use one of these or find something else?
#2
Posted 06 January 2013 - 03:10 PM

#3
Posted 06 January 2013 - 04:50 PM
#4
Posted 06 January 2013 - 05:08 PM
no its a middle range cam a fast cam was a 569 and a race was 649.....look in the blue or latter yellow bible (D Visard)for cam identification.....
Like I said....I know very little about cam selection...lol
#5
Posted 07 January 2013 - 11:47 AM
Out of the 2 which is the better cam to use?
#6
Posted 07 January 2013 - 12:22 PM
Power will come in from about 3000 rpm and continue up to around 6800 rpm with peak power at around 6250 rpm, so if the cam is to be used to the full advantage a centre-main bearing strap is a good idea as is a full dynamic crank, rods, flywheel balance.
The 544 was the old BMC 'works' rally camshaft in the 1275, although other cames were used for different events.
Time it in at 110 degrees ATDC.
To keep it 'on the cam' a final drive ratio of no higher than 3.44:1, or even 3.76:1, should be used with standard gear ratios.
#7
Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:47 PM
With an improved and gas-flowed head using 35mm inlet valves and 29.5 mm or 30.5 mm exhaust valves the 544 is a nice cam. The induction system needs to be an HIF44, HS6 or twin HS4's on a good gas-flowed manifold with a good ex. system, typically a Miniflow 1.75" twin-box system.
Power will come in from about 3000 rpm and continue up to around 6800 rpm with peak power at around 6250 rpm, so if the cam is to be used to the full advantage a centre-main bearing strap is a good idea as is a full dynamic crank, rods, flywheel balance.
The 544 was the old BMC 'works' rally camshaft in the 1275, although other cames were used for different events.
Time it in at 110 degrees ATDC.
To keep it 'on the cam' a final drive ratio of no higher than 3.44:1, or even 3.76:1, should be used with standard gear ratios.
Great info!
Thanks for the reply.
#8
Posted 07 January 2013 - 05:33 PM
#9
Posted 07 January 2013 - 07:59 PM
#10
Posted 08 January 2013 - 11:41 PM
Edited by Marlin, 09 January 2013 - 12:12 AM.
#11
Posted 09 January 2013 - 12:55 AM
The same comments about FDR and engine build spec apply to 286 as apply to 544. Both are great cams for top-end power.
#12
Posted 09 January 2013 - 12:58 AM
#13
Posted 09 January 2013 - 01:01 AM
#14
Posted 10 January 2013 - 10:04 AM
#15
Posted 10 January 2013 - 08:30 PM
I do know that when I changed from a 544 to a 286 the engine characteristics were ideal on twisty tarmac or gravel with a 3.9:1 FDR and SC CR gearbox.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users