
998 turbo?
#1
Posted 09 April 2006 - 04:23 PM
#2
Posted 09 April 2006 - 08:13 PM
Phil.

#3
Posted 09 April 2006 - 10:20 PM

what are 1098's like over 998's for turboing? Does the little bit of extra tourqe make any difference?
#4
Posted 10 April 2006 - 07:12 AM
However, as a general rule of thumb a turbo motor usually make a similar torque to BHP, and 75lbft of torque would be good for a well modded 1275.
I also think that at 10psi you should make more like 80 to 90 BHP on a 998.
Wil
#5
Posted 10 April 2006 - 10:58 AM
Anyhow going back to the 998 idea does anyone have a good sugestion of camshaft? Also having never taken A+ 998 block to bits does anyone know whether the camshaft is a slot or a spider drive?
#6
Posted 10 April 2006 - 10:33 AM
Prefered cam is the KC500 (Kent) or an Mg metro (non-turbo), they are the same cam.
This is my experiance only, I don't know another running 998 turbo. But I tried an Avonbar PH2 and it didn't work for me.
Wil
#7
Posted 10 April 2006 - 11:55 AM

Cam wise I want something quite lumpy as the car wont be a daily drive so I can get away with something a little more wild

#8
Posted 10 April 2006 - 12:48 PM
My 998 turbo has 140bhp with a KC500, so what more do you need. I've kept the same cam and am hoping for 150+ with the new engine.
What are the pistons you have then? if it's the later slipper type pistons then make sure you keep the boost to a maximum of 10psi. If you have the earlier circlip fitment pistons (P20773 type) then these will take much more punnishment.
Wil
#9
Posted 10 April 2006 - 01:11 PM
I have the earlier type pistons! Yay! That was more of a luck thing, I had no idea so cheers for the info.
#10
Posted 10 April 2006 - 04:50 PM
Will, would you be wiling to post up a rough spec of yours + power output etc, & any other pitfalls to watch for such as the piston advice above.
I've never Turbo'd a 998 or a naturally asp motor for that matter so you certainly have a better knowledge in this area of what's suitable.
I could then pin this for future reference.
Phil.

#11
Posted 10 April 2006 - 09:44 PM
Wil
#12
Posted 11 April 2006 - 07:35 AM

#13
Posted 17 April 2006 - 07:11 PM
TURBO SYSTEM
MG Metro Turbo System – Inlet & exhaust manifolds, Garrett T3, Alloy Plenum, Carburettor;
Fuel Pump - 60psi roller vane Sytec pump;
Intercooler - Isuzu Trooper Intercooler with various Silicon hoses;
Dumpvalve - Plunger type, mounted on inlet to plenum;
Exhaust - Maniflow turbo downpipe connected to bespoke 2” system.
ENGINE
Cylinder Head - 12G940 with ground out chambers to lower CR (7.3:1) and sodium filled exhaust valves;
Block - Pocketed to allow fitment of 12G940, centre main strap;
Pistons - Crappo hepolite type with 7cc dish;
Con Rods - Standard A+;
Crank - Balanced, wedged and nitrided;
Camshaft - Kent 500 with 1.5 roller rockers and Beltdrive.
DRIVETRAIN
Flywheel & Clutch - Ultralight Minispares Flywheel and backplate, gray diaphragm and sintered paddle clutch plate;
Drop Gears - Straight-cut (1.0416:1);
Gearbox - Straight Cut Close Ratio (Minispares set)
Diff - Tranx LSD (This is a new mod, used cross pin open diff till now).
COOLING
Radiator - Standard 3 core (could do with something bigger/better);
Water Pump - Standard pump filed to allow head fitment;
Fan - 4 blade metal fan.
IGNITION
Fully mappble Megasquirt system.
POWER and PERFORMANCE
120-130bhp @ 6100rpm and 18psi;
120 ftlb torque at 4900rpm;
Boost threshold around 4000rpm.
Standing ¼ mile in 14.08 seconds at 96mph.
0 to 60 in 5.5 seconds (approx).
#14
Posted 26 April 2006 - 02:26 PM
Am I understanding you right!?
Do you have any rolling-road data-sheets/diagrams to proof this!?
Sorry, but i can`t believe it...


best regards,
Jan
#15
Posted 26 April 2006 - 08:47 PM

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users