First off, I'm not talking about 1330 as most people seem to think. 1340, being a short stroke 1380.
I'm building a mini for the weekends. I dont intend on driving it daily, or racing round tracks. I'm just looking for as much fun as possible.
I have three blocks and three cranks. All could do with a re-bore and re-grind.
Asides from any cost factors, what's the pro's and cons or running a 1340 over a 1380? I've heard lots of people say that they wished their 1380's would rev more, but seems to be a difference of opinion over 1340.
I'll be bolting a turbo on but won't be running massive boost.
Pro's And Cons Of 1340?
Started by
JustSteve
, Feb 04 2013 06:39 PM
3 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 04 February 2013 - 06:39 PM
#2
Posted 04 February 2013 - 10:15 PM
The thing is with a turbo is that RPM is not limited by the usual factors. For one you'll run a mild cam.
Better to run a standard stroke and minimum overbore to clean up bores. a 1275 will still happily make 200 bhp with boost
Better to run a standard stroke and minimum overbore to clean up bores. a 1275 will still happily make 200 bhp with boost
#3
Posted 05 February 2013 - 01:39 PM
Agree with Wil. Don't go silly on the spend just a nice strong bottom end and wind the boost up.
#4
Posted 05 February 2013 - 02:26 PM
1293 light rebores with decent pistons can give great results.
As the guys have said above, 1275 engines are more than capable of very good BHP figures indeed.
The people I have seen with 1380 engines with turbo's seem to have more head gasket issues? maybe the thin wall between 2 and 3 cylinders? Not all but enough to have put me off going this route.
As the guys have said above, 1275 engines are more than capable of very good BHP figures indeed.
The people I have seen with 1380 engines with turbo's seem to have more head gasket issues? maybe the thin wall between 2 and 3 cylinders? Not all but enough to have put me off going this route.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users