
Hydrolastic to rubber suspension
#1
Posted 19 April 2006 - 11:40 PM
#2
Posted 20 April 2006 - 12:34 PM
I'm not trying to drive you away from this forum for the answer, but if no one posts the specifics here, go to the Mini Spares web site and post the question on their board. I think it's fair to say that they have more Mk1 to Mk3 car owners on that board and someone there will know the answer.
one:
http://www.minimania...3/msgthread.cfm
two:
http://www.minimania...2/msgthread.cfm
three:
http://www.minimania...2/msgthread.cfm
four:
http://www.minimania...2/msgthread.cfm
five:
http://www.minimania...3/msgthread.cfm
After reading some of these posts I think you'll be able to identify about four people to email who will have the answers you need... assuming someone doesn't post here first.
#3
Posted 20 April 2006 - 12:41 PM
The rear radies arms/handbtake quadrants/handbrake cables are different. The front arms are different too.
These components can be resued but you will get a firm ride/heavy steering.
Obvioulsy, you will need rubber cones, trumpets (or HiLos) and dampers
#4
Posted 20 April 2006 - 10:54 PM
#5
Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:30 AM
i have also heared that you can fit shocks to the front to improve the handling on a hydro car, so i might try this instead as i have a spare set of top mounts and shocks. only need on front as being linked to the rear they dampen front and rear.
any one else tried this ?
#6
Posted 21 April 2006 - 01:04 PM
There were two principal tweaks that were done to sharpen them up
1. Add a helper spring at the rear
2. Add shock absorber at the front.
You will need the absorber mouting bracket as hydo cars didnt come with them - however, they did have the mounting holes fitted.
#7
Posted 21 April 2006 - 01:43 PM
#8
Posted 21 April 2006 - 01:46 PM
I've always wanted to experiment with a hydro set up, so if anyone wants to get rid of a set that isn't shot, let me know!
2nd dibs - they are supposed to be much more comfy - uprated I'm sure they would be great in a road car
#9
Posted 21 April 2006 - 07:35 PM
Progressive bump stops are good on hydro cars as well.
#10
Posted 21 April 2006 - 09:08 PM

And dan's right, they should have helper springs on the rear as standard (to compensate for the fact that the rear is a lot lighter than the front).
Most comfortable suspension ever incidentally! What I don't get is why people don't like it so much. In my mind, theoretically wouldn't a hydrolastic car have no body roll?
#11
Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:01 PM
Edited by Dan, 21 April 2006 - 11:02 PM.
#12
Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:10 PM
I thought the front suspension was linked to the rear so as the front wheels moved up for a bump the back moved down to keep the car level. So surely if you break hard the car will go down and the front and up at the back increasing the "dive". or is that not what you ment by dive?
And how do you get roll as surely you cant push both wheels up at the same time or pull the other 2 out at the same time either? so you would just get roll from compressing the side wall of the tyre wouldnt you? Ive never driven a hydro car but thats just my understanding of how it works. Can some one enlighten me as to why im wrong as i suspect Dan knows far more about it than I do.
#13
Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:14 PM
#14
Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:24 PM
And yes I wasn't fully clear about the dive situation, sorry. It will dive and climb with acceleration and deceleration but not with the road surface, like speed bumps.
I'll see if I can scan the pages from my BMC Mk2 workshop manual about hydro.
#15
Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:28 PM

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users