Yes you are correct....I found them but after navigating 2 pages and one of those I have to scroll to the bottom to eliminate that page, if it was a rear valence its 4 pages of searching. I do not think it is a case of being used to, I think its that way because it is more efficient. Aesthetically that could have been achieved by a pop out navigation bar?
Ah, I see. Thanks for expanding on that. Very helpful.
What this comes down to is use of sections. If we were using the same sections as your MS example, it would be exactly that same level of navigational clicks. i.e. click once to open 'body'. Click again to open 'panel'. Click again to open 'wings' or 'rear' or whatever. We could set up sections in the same way if we concluded it to be advantageous.
In ours, and using panels as your example, you currently click 'main shell' (equivalent to MS 'body') and then you have to browse the pages to get to what you are looking for. Probably the same number of clicks, but in a different way. The issue you have found is the scrolling through the pages. Point taken.
It's interesting to talk about the way people like to navigate sites. Ultimately, it's all about how you can find what you are looking for.
Personally, I have a habit of using the search firstly, then if it doesn't return the results I am looking for, I try browsing. I appreciate others will do it the other way round. Our challenge is to make both ways as easy as possible.
Once again, many thanks for the feedback. All useful stuff
Edited by ado15, 15 August 2013 - 03:51 PM.