Yes, that is what I would do too. It is not possible to quote amps, or pressure, or time, based on the settings on one welder and expect them to be the same on another, as the calibrations are most likely only approximate and will vary from one type of machine to another.
Mush like MIG, where it is no use telling someone that you set your Clarke 150Te to a certain set of numbers, while he is using a Sealey. It has to be done by test, in actual working conditions.
The one thing that is easier with the spot welder is that once it is set for one chosen set of arms and two thicknesses of 0.9mm, as it will be for most of the work, the same settings will apply whether you are using it horizontally, vertically or upside down. Not so with MIG or most other welding processes. But be aware that the welding current will drop if longer arms are used, or there is a lot of steel between the arms (lower edge of outer sill to floor, for example), which affects the inductance of the circuit. A really clever, modern and expensive spot welder will compensate for that automatically, most will not.
The state of the art in electronics strongly suggests that DC spot welders, which will be insensitive to steel within the circuit, will be coming within the next decade, and affordable for DIY use a decade later. They will be lightweight as they will use a high frequency inverter and synchronous rectifer instead of a big iron-cored transformer. If you are curious, the driving force is the advent of small, low on-resistance MOSFETs, and you can already get one beefy enough to switch a starter motor. (Pointless way of doing it actually, the traditional solenoid will be around for a very long time.) A dozen or so in parallel is getting towards spot welding territory.