An inertia valve is indeed a useful thing, but it still can't distinguish between the deceleration obtainable on a wet road as opposed to dry. Often in engineering, no solution is perfect, but some are better than others. I think that one of my ancient cars did use an inertia valve, fairly successfully.
There also used to be load-sensing PRVs, and one of my ancient and decrepit cars (was it the Avenger estate?) had one. That again solves half the problem, because it gives you more pressure to the rear brakes when you have a load in the back.
An ABS system, despite all the potential safety problems that they cause when they go wrong, as they do, would be almost ideal, but to use ABS on the front wheels it is essential to have zero or negative scrub radius, otherwise extremely dangerous instability results. However, a simple ABS system for the rear wheels only would do the job.
Or, the Citroen solution, with full load-sensitive, true proportioning valves front and rear, but possible only in a pumped system. The front to rear brake ratio is always correct, regardless of load, and set so that the fronts lock just before the rears, a legal requirement. You get close to as much braking as is theoretically possible, on all wheels, wet or dry. Very complex to fit in a Mini, and would you be able to get hydraulic seals in the correct material (to be compatible with LHM fluid) to fit Mini cylinders and calipers? If you were doing that,you would also be wanting to fit the Citroen suspension spheres and cylinders, which, if possible, would give far more comfort than any of the half-baked coil spring conversions, while retaining full suspension travel by always running at constant ride height regardless of load.
The sort of upgrade to the Mini that engineers like me dream about, knowing that it is probably impossible.....
Someone will prove me wrong, of course.