Are Exhausts With No Cats Legal For Minis
#1
Posted 25 February 2014 - 08:59 PM
#2
Posted 25 February 2014 - 09:04 PM
What year is your car?
Ofcourse, you dont need a cat if your car pre-dates the cat introduction (1992 onwards generally, not specifically minis)
If your car had a cat from new, then it should be fitted. You will fail an mot for not having a cat and really you are in breach of the law.
#3
Posted 25 February 2014 - 09:08 PM
Balls the mini I'm getting is '94 ;)
#4
Posted 25 February 2014 - 09:12 PM
Balls the mini I'm getting is '94 ;)
Carb or injection?
#5
Posted 25 February 2014 - 09:16 PM
Attached Files
Edited by Jacks, 25 February 2014 - 09:17 PM.
#6
Posted 25 February 2014 - 09:18 PM
My comment ref 1992 onwards, was generic, not specifically minis.
#7
Posted 25 February 2014 - 09:34 PM
Should have a cat I think, cars are prohibited ( I think this is the right word for it) to have a cat since 1992 in belgium..
#8
Posted 26 February 2014 - 07:13 AM
Balls the mini I'm getting is '94 ;)
Carb or injection?
Sprite SPI :/
#9
Posted 26 February 2014 - 07:19 AM
If it left the factory with a cat, then at the next MOT it needs to be presented with a cat fitted, without its a straight fail.
#10
Posted 26 February 2014 - 07:20 AM
#11
Posted 26 February 2014 - 07:26 AM
It's only a straight fail if the car was fitted with a CAT when it left the factory AND the car is required to pass a full CAT emissions test. (Which only fuel injection models are). If the car isn't required to pass a full CAT emissions test (which no carb mini is), then according to the MOT regs the tester isn't required to check for the presence of a catalytic converter in the first place.If it left the factory with a cat, then at the next MOT it needs to be presented with a cat fitted, without its a straight fail.
I have had this verified by three different MOT inspectors and my decated 93 carb model, had passed every MOT since the change in regs about the need for a CAT if one was fitted as standard was brought in. The change in regs has been widely misinterpreted though (even amongst MOT inspectors) so you need to find an MOT inspector who understands how the regs need to be applied to older cars.
#12
Posted 26 February 2014 - 11:44 AM
most people i know who have mpi, spi, cat pipes use a cat for mot purposes and fit a decat pipe the rest of the year....
#13
Posted 26 February 2014 - 11:59 AM
most people i know who have mpi, spi, cat pipes use a cat for mot purposes and fit a decat pipe the rest of the year....
But really what is the benefit of removing the CAT? 1 horsepower?
I could easily sacrifice that, in place of having to climb under an oily mini twice a year and fight with rusty seized bolts.
#14
Posted 26 February 2014 - 12:01 PM
most people i know who have mpi, spi, cat pipes use a cat for mot purposes and fit a decat pipe the rest of the year....
But really what is the benefit of removing the CAT? 1 horsepower?
I could easily sacrifice that, in place of having to climb under an oily mini twice a year and fight with rusty seized bolts.
Makes quite abit difference on MPi's. Well it freed up mine quite abit anyway, alot more responsive at 60-90.
#15
Posted 26 February 2014 - 12:07 PM
most people i know who have mpi, spi, cat pipes use a cat for mot purposes and fit a decat pipe the rest of the year....
But really what is the benefit of removing the CAT? 1 horsepower?
I could easily sacrifice that, in place of having to climb under an oily mini twice a year and fight with rusty seized bolts.
not my preference I prefer carb and no need for a cat....
think most people do it for the extra noise rather than the bhp to be honest
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












