
Tyres
#16
Posted 12 October 2006 - 10:05 PM
the falkens are a harder compound and dont have as much grip due to this. hence the reason why i run them on the back
they are a good tyre mind especially in the wet, but they have a tendancy to just ''snap'' you dont get much feed back from them on the limit so they all of a sudden just start to slide, this has happened a couple of times under different loadings
they are a good longer lasting tyre
so if you want longivity then the falkens but if you want more grip but slightly higher wear rates then go for the yoko 539's
gaz
#17
Posted 12 October 2006 - 10:12 PM
Stuart.
#18
Posted 14 October 2006 - 04:51 PM

Falkens are much harder, abit cheaper and last longer but dont grip as well as yokos in wet or dry
http://gallery.sc0ri...s)/DSCF2140.JPG
My next set will be yoko A048 R's

Edited by Mini Mad James, 14 October 2006 - 04:53 PM.
#19
Posted 14 October 2006 - 05:05 PM
So has anyone any experience with Falkens in this size?
I've had 165*60/12 Falkens fitted to my Mini for the past few years and I've found them okay. But I want to try Yoko's next as i've heard lots of good things said about them from most people.
#20
Posted 14 October 2006 - 06:05 PM
Yokohama it is, thanks guys P.S. this is the car
Stuart.
#21
Posted 15 October 2006 - 12:05 PM
#22
Posted 15 October 2006 - 12:23 PM
I've tried a few tyres in my time too, but mainly in the 13" size, I upgraded to 13" when all that was available for 12" was a 155/70x12.
In the 13" the Pirelli P7F rated highly, in both wet and dry, but only when new and no more than half worn, mine went off when they got half worn.
The best tyres I had were Yoko A001's similar to the new A048's but with a full 8mm tread.
Here's a photo taken about 19 years ago with the rather fat A001's on.
Stuart.
#23
Posted 28 October 2006 - 10:13 AM
Nobody mentioned Falkens, I wonder how these compare to the yokos? the Falkens seem a very popular tyre and I prefer the normal looks of them, yes I know looks is not the most important aspect to look for.
I had some A008's years ago and didn't like them at all, I believe some of the later ones used a softer compound to the ones I had. I guess this experience has put me off Yokohama tyres a bit, even though in reality the best tyres I've ever had were Yoko A001's, a brilliant tyre.
So has anyone any experience with Falkens in this size?
Not this size but I have 165/70-10 Falken FK-07E's and they took me off for an entertaining 4 wheel drift at about 20 mph round a roundabout the other day. Hence I am looking for wet weather replacements too.
Great in the dry but I am unconvinced in the wet.
Trace.
#24
Posted 28 October 2006 - 10:29 AM
#25
Posted 28 October 2006 - 11:49 AM
the falkens are a very hard compound of rubber!! i have a set on my 10s that are honestly years old!! very good with hard use or if warm! my money is still with the yokos tho!! good all rounder!!
pirellis on 13's were ok in the wet but lacked the security and grip of the yoko in the dry!! i've heard this about them with all sizes!!
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users