
Mega Jolt - What Are The Benefits?
#1
Posted 01 November 2016 - 08:50 PM
As you'd expect car has plenty of go and pulls cleanly from 3000 rpm and you can nurse it along below that. I definitely do not want a milder cam or to de-rate it in anyway, love the way it goes on the open road, just thinking about the things that stop me using it a lot more.
Mainly l'd like to improve the starting and cold running. If it was a bit easier to start and a little happier in stop start traffic I would drive it more, making it easier to drive to work which is 15 - 20 miles of mostly country A roads, just that there's always a 10 min queue to suffer at home time.
What effect would mega jolt have on:
Starting?
Cold running?
Tick over?
Emissions?
Mid range torque and power?
Part throttle and road manners?
#2
Posted 01 November 2016 - 11:07 PM
Engine is 1380, 296 cam, dcoe45 on 5" manifold, 3.7fd on sccr box, big valve head and 1.5 rockers. Car is road legal hill climber, currently using Aldon electronic ignition with modified dizzy.
As you'd expect car has plenty of go and pulls cleanly from 3000 rpm and you can nurse it along below that. I definitely do not want a milder cam or to de-rate it in anyway, love the way it goes on the open road, just thinking about the things that stop me using it a lot more.
Mainly l'd like to improve the starting and cold running. If it was a bit easier to start and a little happier in stop start traffic I would drive it more, making it easier to drive to work which is 15 - 20 miles of mostly country A roads, just that there's always a 10 min queue to suffer at home time.
What effect would mega jolt have on:
Starting?
Cold running?
Tick over?
Emissions?
Mid range torque and power?
Part throttle and road manners?
I've got a good feeling that you have answered your own question and you have the flexibility of different curves for different driving styles.
https://www.autospor...should-fit-one/
Edited by neal, 02 November 2016 - 07:12 AM.
#3
Posted 02 November 2016 - 12:01 AM
But even so you should not be having cold start issues with that set up
Consider this any part throttle running will need a throttle body pot fitting (no idea what imputs the mega jolt has) and exhaust gas analysis is useful.
#4
Posted 02 November 2016 - 04:27 AM
#5
Posted 02 November 2016 - 07:03 AM
#6
Posted 02 November 2016 - 07:13 AM
The cold start mechanism is, like any part of the Weber carb, something that you need to fine tune.
Megajolt on that setup will make it a lot easier to tame on the low revs. But ,ofcourse, it will never be ideal with that cam.
#7
Posted 02 November 2016 - 07:18 AM
Consider all the mechanical links from the moment the crankshaft turns to the rotor arm turning, if there is the slightest bit of play will this not affect your timing?
I'm considering spark scatter on a cold engine with a standard ignition format. Surely a mega jolt should help to reduce an amplified cold running issue?
Edited by neal, 02 November 2016 - 07:25 AM.
#8
Posted 02 November 2016 - 10:31 AM
Consider all the mechanical links from the moment the crankshaft turns to the rotor arm turning, if there is the slightest bit of play will this not affect your timing?
I'm considering spark scatter on a cold engine with a standard ignition format. Surely a mega jolt should help to reduce an amplified cold running issue?
it should start fine on Points if set correctly, never had issues before MegaJolt or any other mapped system.
just makes it tamer at low revs as you can set it accordingly.
I still run mechanical advance on mine with no real issues except for going slowly.
#9
Posted 02 November 2016 - 03:46 PM
Another alternative than the Mega Jolt to give you mappable ignition would be the Aldon Amethyst (TPS version).
http://www.aldonamethyst.co.uk/
http://www.aldonauto.../aldon-amethyst
Just throwing it out there as another option for you.
#10
Posted 02 November 2016 - 04:20 PM
I would personally go for a trigger wheel like the megajolt unit over somthing that works from a dizzy as the accuracy will be much better.
#11
Posted 02 November 2016 - 05:26 PM
#12
Posted 02 November 2016 - 05:43 PM
#13
Posted 02 November 2016 - 05:50 PM
With reference to charge robbing if you get a certain mega squirt (v3 I think, maybe even v2?) you can program it to cope with the siamese ports.
Edited by Smackfiend, 02 November 2016 - 05:56 PM.
#14
Posted 02 November 2016 - 07:45 PM
Yes a crank sensor is the most accurate way of measuring crank position, but fitting involves a great deal of work (engine out?) and extra cost.
Anybody who has set up static timing knows that, when the crankshaft is turned, there is some play before the distributor shaft starts to move. Aldon's tests with fixed advance and a strobe light suggest that play is generally very small once the slack has been taken up, usually less than a degree.
Aldon state that it is theoretically possible to make Amethyst trigger from almost any type of distributor or crankshaft position sensor if you wanted to go down that road.
Furthermore if the chain cam drive is good enough to open and close my valves at the end of the day....
Anyways there's a few options on this thread for Haynes to ponder. Always good to have choices at the end of the day!
#15
Posted 02 November 2016 - 10:39 PM
Mapable ignition makes huge amount of difference, the engine idles smoother and flats spots in the torque can be overcome with some mapping and setting up. Well worth the money in my opinion.
I fitted it to a dyno at my old work, to run Vintage Bugatti engines on, as the magnetos would give too much interference for lambdas to work. They gained power also running on Mega Jolt.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users