22 replies to this topic

[IronmanG]

 Screenshot_20220107-172638_Gallery.jpg   16.25K   29 downloads

[KTS]

..i'd be happier if it was bigger and rotated 90 degrees..

 

looks like it should pull well 

[IronmanG]

..i'd be happier if it was bigger and rotated 90 degrees..
 
looks like it should pull well 

Just for you Pat  Screenshot_20220107-180305_Gallery.jpg   13.55K   62 downloads

[I hate Brian]

still not clear buddy

[I hate Brian]

Cant zoom in enough

[I hate Brian]

What's your engine spec ?

[IronmanG]

still not clear buddy

Sorry best I can do
85 torques across from 3500 to 6509
106 hp max at 6500

[PoolGuy]

Sorry best I can do
85 torques across from 3500 to 6509
106 hp max at 6500

 

I'd be happy with that...

[KTS]

the torque curve does look very good

 

you'll have to let us know how happy you are with it once you get it on the road

[I hate Brian]

What's your engine spec ?

[Turbo Phil]

Depends what the spec is?

Phil.

[IronmanG]

1310 7 port
I am disappointed with the torque to be honest

[gaspen]

Red is your budget, blue is the cost of resto ? 

[ACDodd]

Big ports don’t make torque

I that specialist components dyno run?

All my cams give less torque than I see on other dynoes. It’s to
Do with the way it’s measured. The main thing here is how it drives.

I usually see 92 lbft and 95lbft respectively when these are run on a sweep rather than hold and load.

Ac

Attached Files

•  ECD09997-A3A3-4E74-8E8C-8AD737F2B997.jpeg   58.82K   9 downloads

Edited by ACDodd, 07 January 2022 - 08:05 PM.

[IronmanG]

[quote name="gaspen" post="3711556" timestamp="1641585167"]

Red is your budget, blue is the cost of resto ? [/quote

For sure!