
Rear Subframe Too Boot Floor
#1
Posted 14 January 2023 - 03:17 PM
#2
Posted 15 January 2023 - 01:08 AM
There should be a gap, it was filled with not very appropriate padding at some points in time. 10mm sounds a little big, but can't say I ever measured it
#3
Posted 15 January 2023 - 10:19 AM
#4
Posted 15 January 2023 - 12:32 PM
#5
Posted 15 January 2023 - 01:06 PM
Sorry I think we are at crossed wires I was referring to the gap between the subframe and the underside of the boot floor which at its smallest gap is about 10mm thanks for taking an interest
I did mean between the top of the rear subby (above the cone & trumpet) and the floor inboard of the wheel arches. There's a gap, presumably to stop them vibrating together. I also presume that's why they saw fit to stick, damp holding, matting in there.
10mm does sound bigger than I recall. Even if I'm right, I can't see it mattering.
#6
Posted 15 January 2023 - 02:54 PM
#7
Posted 15 January 2023 - 05:29 PM
Sorry I think we are at crossed wires I was referring to the gap between the subframe and the underside of the boot floor which at its smallest gap is about 10mm thanks for taking an interest
I did mean between the top of the rear subby (above the cone & trumpet) and the floor inboard of the wheel arches. There's a gap, presumably to stop them vibrating together. I also presume that's why they saw fit to stick, damp holding, matting in there.
10mm does sound bigger than I recall. Even if I'm right, I can't see it mattering.
I can vouch for at least one '59 Morris Mini-Minor, (the ones with the thinner gauge steel and smaller drain holes in the gutter) having an annoying thrumming from the boot area.
I don't know if there was ever a recall, but by Autumn '60, cars came off the production line with "a strip of the soggy under-felt from the footwell", jammed between the body and the rear subframe.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users