https://youtu.be/jba...mIm-i3NzIlwLn4w
well worth a watch.
will be interesting when he gets onto the 1275s
Posted 13 October 2026 - 10:13 PM
https://youtu.be/jba...mIm-i3NzIlwLn4w
well worth a watch.
will be interesting when he gets onto the 1275s
Posted Yesterday, 09:08 AM
Watched it yesterday. Very informative but would be interested in a wider study of cone v foam filters as well. Is it worthwhile going back to the Hawthorn or drilled air boxes for increased torque or power figures?
Posted Yesterday, 09:41 AM
good video and agree will be interesting to see results for 1275. only one issue all testing was done with bonnet open ( i know the point was flow testing) but how will having it closed affect these results as holes underneath and towards the rear will be drawing hot air from rear of engine compartment. Holes at the front face getting cooler air, especially if a distributor guard is fitted as this will direct air towards the filter, would be the best!
Edited by coopertaz, Yesterday, 10:05 AM.
Posted Yesterday, 09:45 AM
Watched it yesterday. Very informative but would be interested in a wider study of cone v foam filters as well. Is it worthwhile going back to the Hawthorn or drilled air boxes for increased torque or power figures?
i remember the keith Calver article in miniworld that ken refers to and he did test the k&n straight onto the carb and found that removing the elbow on the carb inlet led to a reduction in low end torque, ram length change as referanced in the video, and only a couple of bhp over a drilled airbox at the top end. the reason i began drilling the front of mine in the first place.
Posted Yesterday, 09:57 AM
I don't think he's quite right about how filter flow restriction effects AFR, the carb venturi works on velocity "variable venturi - constant depression". It's the air's density that's dropped (fewer oxygen molecules by volume). Though a HS carb (at least) has atmospheric pressure, outside of any pressure drop caused by the filter, pushing fuel towards the venturi.
Would've been interesting to compare some of the factory improved cases & a bell mouth or ram pipe added to the original snorkel - that's what that case came with originally.
Posted Yesterday, 04:30 PM
Edited by ACDodd, Yesterday, 04:31 PM.
Posted Yesterday, 10:28 PM
It's a moot point, I'm not doubting the effect. Everything else being equal, you can't have lower pressure without also having less mass. Lower pressure in the venturi will also act on the piston, which has a much bigger area than the jet, with the effect of inserting more needle in to the jet.
There's 2 constants attempting to close the venturi, the piston's weight & the spring. To open it there's the pressure differential above & below the piston, both will be subject to any effect a filter has. You're left with the Bernoulli effect that lifts the piston proportional to the air velocity to meter the fuel by the area of the jet (according to the needle profile).
Posted Yesterday, 11:48 PM
Posted Today, 09:21 AM
If there's additional vacuum over the jet, then there's also additional vacuum under the piston.
What are you measuring your flow potential in? If it's CFM, or similar, then you're saying the same as me - it's volume, not mass (which is lower because pressure is lower because of the filter's restriction).
You make an SU boost sensitive by feeding boost pressure to the float chamber, it's the same as as a normally aspirated setup using atmospheric pressure to raise the fuel level in the jet as the venturi effect acts on the opposite end to the float chamber.
Carbs have to operate in a world where weather & altitude constantly change air pressure. An SU is effectively a U tube barometer with a venturi on one end. That venturi is regulated by a spring & 2 chambers that use the relative pressure difference from before & just after the venturi to compress the spring.
Posted Today, 06:18 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users