1971 Mini "Cooper"
#1
Posted 06 December 2006 - 03:02 PM
Sorry if this is the wrong forum for this thread. (1st post so not totally up to speed yet!)
I'm looking at buying a 1971 mini that's billed as a cooper. However I was under the impression that the 1971 cooper came with front discs? (I thought all coopers from '61 onwards had these?!?) The car I am looking at has drums all round, and while the bonnet stripes and decals seem o.k. this particular aspect of the car is puzzling me. I can't figure out how large the engine cc is to get a better idea of whether it's a cooper or not either.
Would someone be able to set my admittedly meagre knowledge of mini cooper history straight so I can know if this is a cooper or not?
Many thanks.
Q
#2
Posted 06 December 2006 - 03:06 PM
google search the cooper register maybe!!
#3
Posted 06 December 2006 - 04:13 PM
That's what I thought... I contacted the mini club where a previous owner was a member to ask if they had any more info on the car. (Awaiting a reply from them)
They're asking £2000 for it with MOT due and from what I could see on inspection: sill problems, scuttle rust on both sides, rust hole under one headlight and bad repair job on the other. Subframe looked o.k. ish (from the angle I was at) and the roof and door skins were good. The paint job is fading though and there are gp 2/3 arches fitted with 10" Wellers I think, so despite the age certainly not original and unmolested. I thought the price a bit steep though so will see if I can bargain if I decide to go for it.
The interior is nice enough however... Need to get a look inside and in the footwells however...
#4
Posted 06 December 2006 - 07:10 PM
Not got time to plough through pages of info as I'm on my way out.....but you could try reading through some of the stuff on here....
http://www.minicoope...s/registers.htm
Were there actually any Coopers produced in 1971?
Edited by minislapper, 06 December 2006 - 07:11 PM.
#5
Posted 06 December 2006 - 08:19 PM
Does it have side repeaters? What Mk lights does it have to the rear? Is there a big hole in the inner wing on the drivers side? Is there reinforcement for rear seat belts?
#6
Posted 06 December 2006 - 08:20 PM
Unless it's an innocenti, which were produced until the mid seventies IIRC.
Drum brakes to me sound very wrong.
I think it's a more likely a stickered up run of the mill car.
#7
Posted 06 December 2006 - 08:35 PM
Does it have side repeaters? What Mk lights does it have to the rear? Is there a big hole in the inner wing on the drivers side? Is there reinforcement for rear seat belts?
It doesn't have side repeaters, it has mk3 lights though, couldn't check under the bonnet yet, ditto for inside the car. It has many aftermarket parts so the mk3 lights could have been a repair/replacemet?!?
...Will see if I can save/upload some pics of it... Give me a min
Here go pics:
Did some research myself and vasi is right in so far as if the year is correct then the car if a cooper at all, should be a cooper 'S'.
It clearly isn't though.
Me want new mini! :Pete proceeds to throw his toys out of the pram!!!:
Edited by Qw3r7y, 06 December 2006 - 08:47 PM.
#8
Posted 06 December 2006 - 09:22 PM
If you can get to the car, have a look on the boot lock mechanism, the date that boot came out the factory is stamped on it.
#9
Posted 06 December 2006 - 09:25 PM
#10
Posted 06 December 2006 - 10:18 PM
With drum brakes up front it's not a Cooper or -S regardless of what else is on the car.
#11
Posted 06 December 2006 - 10:25 PM
And it would have had hydrolastic suspension if it was a Cooper (ended production in late 1969 in MKII form) or Cooper S (ended production in July 1971 in MKIII form).
But it can't be a Cooper S otherwise it'd have twin petrol tanks!
Edited by taffy1967, 06 December 2006 - 10:27 PM.
#12
Posted 06 December 2006 - 10:34 PM
I suspect that the car has been reprayed / restored fairly recently (maybe in the last 6 years or so), and a few styling mods added. The badges, and decals are wrong for the car, colour seems like it is a later one (roof looks like "diamond white" to me), silver gutter trim is quite recent, as is the silver door sill strip. Something about the door lock mechanism looks later to me, but can't put my finger on it. correct cooper S type calipers and disks are expensive, drums are not, so the car may have had faulty / worn front brakes replaced with a cheaper alternative.
Without higher res / more pics, and pic of the engine, I could'nt say if this car was genuine or not (it may or may not be a late original cooper S that has had a load of styling mods / lost original details over the years).
Nothing wrong with styling a mini, but it does make it harder to verify the age from photos.
with the evidence I can see, I would not be able to say one way or the other, but I would guess that it is prolly NOT a cooper, just a look-alike.
SS
Edited by Silicon Skum, 06 December 2006 - 10:36 PM.
#13
Posted 06 December 2006 - 11:17 PM
buy mine pete doesn't need anywhere near that much work done.
#14
Posted 06 December 2006 - 11:38 PM
#15
Posted 15 December 2006 - 06:11 PM
But as time goes on you will learn, and I would personally steer well clear of that car.
It would be a great idea to attend the large mini shows, and go to the Mini Cooper Register stand. The members there are knowledgable in this field, and canb advise on what makes a genuine cooper, and the best route to obtaining one.
A great booke is called "Original Mini Cooper and Cooper S" by John Parnell. It has great colour pictures and descriptions of what makes true spec Mk1, Mk2 and Mk3 coopers.
Seller sounds like a real t*w*a*t
Edited by mk=john, 15 December 2006 - 06:24 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users