
Remote change shell/rod change box
#1
Posted 13 December 2006 - 10:50 AM
If I were to convert my '71 MKIII shell to accept a rod-change box, would I have to cut so much of the tunnel away that I would never be able to change it back? I am considering doing this so that I can fit my A+ SCCR 'box into the shell, but obviously that is rod change.
What other options do I have? Could I use the A+ internals inside the remote change 'box? Is the casing up to the job? I will be running IRO 100 donkies and hopefuly a bucketfull of torque through this 'box and also the rubber couplings.
Basically, how much modifying is required to fit the rod change doofah? Would it be lessened if I were to fit a couple of UJ's to the rod change and fit the gearshift higher up, inside the vehicle?
EDIT: Actually, the tunnel appears flatter than a later rod change one, perhaps this would leave the base of the gear change unit too low? Maybe it's best all around if I try to rig it all up internally as I suggested above.
#2
Posted 13 December 2006 - 10:59 AM
I think webweavers may be able to help there as he has a 30 which I believe is being cut up.
Never realy had a close inspection...
As for putting the internals into a remote, yes it's possible, but the reverse idler would need to be changed, as would your idler gear in the drops, both of which would be dependant on availability...
#3
Posted 13 December 2006 - 11:02 AM
#4
Posted 13 December 2006 - 11:02 AM
#5
Posted 13 December 2006 - 11:03 AM

I might cut the tunnel from the scrap shell anyway, so I can use it as a pattern to compare the two setups. Then I can see just how different they are.

#6
Posted 13 December 2006 - 09:41 PM
in fact i am almost 100% sure (apart from drilling new holes for the rod box)
#7
Posted 14 December 2006 - 01:19 AM
dave
#8
Posted 14 December 2006 - 09:00 AM
minispares used to sell and believe they still sell a converttion plate to hod rod change in remote tunnel wih no cutting
dave
Dave, you are a legend!
*Matt runs off to the Minispares site*
#9
Posted 14 December 2006 - 12:56 PM
the remote is much bigger than the rods so i think no mods are needed to the tunnel
in fact i am almost 100% sure (apart from drilling new holes for the rod box)
But the remote is mounted in a totally different place (off to the left, rather than tunnel centre).

#10
Posted 14 December 2006 - 01:00 PM
#11
Posted 14 December 2006 - 02:16 PM

EDIT: Just gonna take some paper and make a template off the MKV tunnel and overlay it on the NKIII to see how it compares. If it's only a case of drilling 4 bolt holes and enlarging the cutout then that's not a major problem really.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users