aiming for 230-240bhp. It looks totally chavvy to start with but then the engineering begins to look interesting. I think


Posted 21 March 2007 - 08:47 AM
Posted 21 March 2007 - 10:27 AM
Posted 21 March 2007 - 12:02 PM
Posted 21 March 2007 - 07:07 PM
Edited by mighty_mini, 21 March 2007 - 07:08 PM.
Posted 21 March 2007 - 07:12 PM
Posted 21 March 2007 - 10:16 PM
Posted 22 March 2007 - 02:35 AM
Edited by CanadianMiniFan, 22 March 2007 - 02:39 AM.
Posted 22 March 2007 - 12:06 PM
Edited by Retro_10s, 22 March 2007 - 12:07 PM.
Posted 22 March 2007 - 12:22 PM
Is there such a thing as 'over braking'? i'd rather have disks all round then a disk/drum setup!Would it not over brake the rear having discs on it? Surely the only advantage would be weight reduction over drums?
Posted 22 March 2007 - 01:00 PM
You can't polish a turd
Posted 23 March 2007 - 10:33 AM
No one bothers with disc on the back of a mini, no matter what power the engine is putting out (or more importantly, how heavy the car is).Is there such a thing as 'over braking'? i'd rather have disks all round then a disk/drum setup!Would it not over brake the rear having discs on it? Surely the only advantage would be weight reduction over drums?
Posted 23 March 2007 - 11:01 AM
I'm talking about if I owned that micra, not the miniNo one bothers with disc on the back of a mini, no matter what power the engine is putting out (or more importantly, how heavy the car is).Is there such a thing as 'over braking'? i'd rather have disks all round then a disk/drum setup!Would it not over brake the rear having discs on it? Surely the only advantage would be weight reduction over drums?
Posted 23 March 2007 - 11:25 AM
Posted 23 March 2007 - 11:40 AM
The wisest thing you've said all day!I hate it when a car has side skirts lower than the back bumper!!
Posted 23 March 2007 - 12:16 PM
Edited by Richard, 23 March 2007 - 12:17 PM.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users