
Power to weight ratio? FULL ENGINE SPEC
#1
Posted 22 March 2007 - 10:42 PM
Ive just weighed in Bertie on some axle scale things and it came in at 660kg. Ive still got some slight weight reduction things to carry out,ordered plastic windows yesterday, getting f/g or c/f flip front and sorting rear sub frame. Ive also cut out the door inners and window winders, taken the carpetout and things like that
After speaking to MED the other day they said that they would be expecting at least 130-135bhp out of the build. I will be taking it to slark in April to set it up on the rolling road.
The spec of the engine is as follows in all the jargon that i dont understand!!
So:
Block
Bore 73.5
C.M.S New
Face 020
O/way New
C/brgs New
Acid dip Yes
11 stud Yes
Crank
Grind Yes
Polish Yes
Ni-temp Yes
Blade yes
X/drill Yes
Wedge Yes
Rods
Bolts New
Nuts New
Lighten Yes
Polish Yes
Pistons
Type Omega
Dish 11cc
Cam
Type 285
Followers New
O/pump New
Timing
Duplex New
BRGS
Mains Comp
Ends Comp
T/W Comp
Clutch
F/wheel Steel
Plate Turbo
B/plate Steel
Balance Full
Cover Orange
Gear type Inertia
R/brg New
Bolt strap New
Head
Rally head
Valves 35.7-30.0
Guides Bronze
L/free Yes
Springs New
Port Comp
11 stud Yes
Chamber Comp
Rockers
1:5
Gearbox
Type Rod
O/put Pot
Gears s/c c/r
Drops R-BRG
Diff X-pin
BRGS New
c.p.u New
c.w.p 3.44
Shims
Primary New
Idler New
BRGS New
S/brg New
It also runs only on smelly Shell V-power and has a weber 45 on a six inch manifold along with a maniflow reverse megaphone system and stage two LCB. Will be fitting my new fuel pump over the weekend.
I also had it test run, got an aldon dizzy thing, new water pump, two tubs of running in oil, new coil and other bits.
I think thats all. So what do you think? Should it be any good?
Johnny
#2
Posted 22 March 2007 - 10:51 PM
based on it actually producing 135 and the wet weight being 660 kg
#3
Posted 22 March 2007 - 10:57 PM

Johnny
#4
Posted 22 March 2007 - 11:07 PM
*runs to bmc book*
#5
Posted 23 March 2007 - 06:53 AM

So what kind of weight loss figure should i be aiming for? With the above mentioned mod to be carried out, is there much weight to be saved from those and what other things could i do?
Johnny
#6
Posted 23 March 2007 - 07:22 AM
Johnny, your power to weight ratio is calculated with the car full of fluids but not driver.
After those mods just wear very thin clothes and eat less fatty foods, you should also cut out beer too. I want to see you down to size zero!!
Only kidding. You wont get your mini much lower than 500 mate if at all.
#7
Posted 23 March 2007 - 08:05 PM

Slightly off topic. Would it be worth fitting a super charger to the engine or would it sap more bhp than gain? Just thinking of ways to get more power in.
Johnny
#8
Posted 23 March 2007 - 08:21 PM
drive naked.
Save a bit of weight like that.
edit
Super would be the easiest and quickest route to loads of power. Turbo means ripping the car apart again to fit a turbo bulkhead box.
Edited by Big_Adam, 23 March 2007 - 08:22 PM.
#9
Posted 23 March 2007 - 08:26 PM
#10
Posted 23 March 2007 - 08:59 PM
#11
Posted 23 March 2007 - 10:23 PM
#12
Posted 23 March 2007 - 10:55 PM

#13
Posted 24 March 2007 - 10:16 AM
as far as things go, power to weight ratio, bhp, torque figures weather its at crank or flywheel are just numbers, what matters is the time and speed up the 1/4 mile strip and your lap time round a race circuit!
#14
Posted 24 March 2007 - 10:27 AM
A quick driver in a moderately good car will always be faster than a slower driver in a better car.
I dont think i need to point you towards star in a reasonably priced car now do i?
#15
Posted 24 March 2007 - 10:35 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users