998/ 1098 differences /similarities.
#1
Posted 01 April 2007 - 11:26 AM
I know the bores are the same, and stroke is different, but can you use 998 pistons in a 1098?
im looking at these: http://www.minispare....aspx?pid=38611
#2
Posted 01 April 2007 - 11:30 AM
#3
Posted 01 April 2007 - 11:52 AM
the search is your friend
if i remember rightly it was mentioned that you would have to 1098 pistons.... i think
Edited by cap'n crunch, 01 April 2007 - 11:56 AM.
#4
Posted 01 April 2007 - 02:29 PM
#5
Posted 01 April 2007 - 07:58 PM
in that linked thread, the person was talking about converting his 998 to 1098. this sounds interesting, as if my 998 is an A-plus block, i could theoretically use that, bore it out, find correct pistons, and fit the 1098 crank.
This could be a cracker of an engine me thinks.
#6
Posted 01 April 2007 - 08:08 PM
Ok thanks for that, should have searched, bad Oli!
in that linked thread, the person was talking about converting his 998 to 1098. this sounds interesting, as if my 998 is an A-plus block, i could theoretically use that, bore it out, find correct pistons, and fit the 1098 crank.
This could be a cracker of an engine me thinks.
Yep thats what i am hoping to do, small bore all the way!!!
#7
Posted 01 April 2007 - 08:15 PM
#8
Posted 01 April 2007 - 09:49 PM
Some years ago, I was asked to build an engine for a friend that he had bought from the least reputable of early mini parts suppliers, who is thankfully not as prominent as they used to be.Im having trouble finding over-size pistons for 1098 though, mini spares have LOADS for a 998, +20, +40, +60 and even +80 thou, and some of those in high perfromance versions. Can't see any 1098 pistons though
The engine was a kit of parts supposedly produced by Downton Engineering as a 1088cc conversion. What was actually supplied was a modified 295 head, a 1098 crank, 544 cam, some A+ 998 flat top pistons, and some A+ rods.
The 998 pistons had been machined down to deck height , and having paid a lot of money for what was essentially a bag of scrap, we thought we'd try it and see what happened. This we did, built it with the 544 cam, and the thing was pretty impressive, giving a good 5 years reliable service before being sold on.
Pistons can be a real problem for these engines, I don't recommend going the above route unless the engine is purely a bit of fun to build, and try. The top ring is very close to the piston crown, but I can assure you it can work and can work reliably, only thing I can't remember is which pistons were used.
I know this probably goes against good sense and common wisdom, but its your money, and your bit of fun, so I'll leave it up to you.
#9
Posted 02 April 2007 - 08:53 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users