
Rocker Cover Breathers
#1
Posted 03 April 2007 - 12:54 PM
anyhow he was saying that i should have a breather hole in my rocker cover, cant remember the reason why but he said he swore by having one
i noticed that some old rocker covers used to have breathe pipes on them but the newer cars tended to not
can anyone shed any light on this for me?? pro's and con's of them??
Cheers
Daz
#2
Posted 03 April 2007 - 02:50 PM
I still have the original type that bears the joke (IIRC): "replace every six months"

Has anybody ever done so? I did replace mine once - with one from a Metro at the scrappy - but only because I drove off after I changed my oil and lost the old one.

#3
Posted 03 April 2007 - 02:53 PM
Surely adding a hole into the rocker cover will have the same effect ?
#4
Posted 03 April 2007 - 02:58 PM
Maybe it's for if your cap itself isn't vented?
#5
Posted 03 April 2007 - 03:18 PM
General concensus seems to be that it helps prevent the oil emulsifying under the cover if the car is used only for short journeys.
I still have the original type that bears the joke (IIRC): "replace every six months"
Has anybody ever done so? I did replace mine once - with one from a Metro at the scrappy - but only because I drove off after I changed my oil and lost the old one.
is this why i have mayonaise in my rockers???? changed 3 faultless head gaskets (and 1 very blown one along with the head) and done engine flush and oil change twice.... still emulsified and only do infrequent short journeys.
#6
Posted 03 April 2007 - 03:23 PM
Anyway, people sometimes just slap a breather filter on the outlet from the crank breathers (when using K&Ns etc.)
@ Gav, if you are only ever doing short journeys, that'll probably be the main cause of the 'mayonaisse' in the rocker cover.
Have a search through the projects section and the technical and problems section of the site and see what questions and answers there are on here, it's a subject that's been covered a few times on here with some good responses.

#7
Posted 03 April 2007 - 03:27 PM

Assuming it's accurate it sounds like it though - assuming there's no emulsion / water on your dipstick? Do you have a non - vented cap?
#8
Posted 03 April 2007 - 03:31 PM
Well my knowledge only comes from that linked thread!
![]()
Assuming it's accurate it sounds like it though - assuming there's no emulsion / water on your dipstick? Do you have a non - vented cap?
the sump is clean!!! i'm runn ing a 1380 stage 4
#9
Posted 03 April 2007 - 04:19 PM
#10
Posted 03 April 2007 - 07:58 PM
#11
Posted 03 April 2007 - 10:14 PM
#12
Posted 04 April 2007 - 09:03 AM
Just wondered about the pro's and con's of these and what engines they came standard on and does anyone have them on there car?
#13
Posted 04 April 2007 - 09:05 AM
Edited by fatmini, 04 April 2007 - 09:05 AM.
#14
Posted 04 April 2007 - 11:23 AM
You don't need a breather (or breather take off) on your rocker cover unless you have a highly modified engine. The standard breather points should be capable of removing the crankcase pressure, but you should ensure that they stay unblocked.
#15
Posted 04 April 2007 - 12:20 PM
thanks guys, im now much wiser in the ways of rocker breathers
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users