Mini In The Park
#1
Posted 22 August 2007 - 07:03 PM
I only stayed for a couple of hours as it was freezing cold and looking like rain was on it's way.
Fastest run i saw was Stuart Meads 10.6 secs I think. Next fastest was a huge gap to 12 secs and above.
#2
Posted 22 August 2007 - 08:56 PM
the monte was desappointing as the fuelling is way out we had it on a dyno earlier this year but have changed onto race fuel and its made a huge difference
it was bogging down in 3rd and shouldnt be at all so i tried 2nd gear out the grid that was ok but then it just hadnt any real power as it was running far too rich
back to the dyno for us then
it still did 11.9 seconds but should be in the mid to high 8 seconds if its running right i should have taken the yellow monte as that would have happily run 9 seconds every time
to be fair to the blue monte carlo thats the first time its turned a wheel ever so theres something to build on
chris
#3
Posted 22 August 2007 - 09:24 PM
Cheers
David
#4
Posted 22 August 2007 - 09:33 PM
The jet car did a 6..
Edited by Gr4h4m, 22 August 2007 - 09:34 PM.
#5
Posted 22 August 2007 - 09:48 PM
Although if you put the numbers into the equation in the front of the Vizard book it comes out in the 8 secs bracket. However, mine comes out at 11secs and there is no way it will ever go that fast!!
Edited by R1minimagic, 22 August 2007 - 09:53 PM.
#6
Posted 23 August 2007 - 10:13 AM
I was gonna say the same David.
Although if you put the numbers into the equation in the front of the Vizard book it comes out in the 8 secs bracket. However, mine comes out at 11secs and there is no way it will ever go that fast!!
Did you take any more pics of the blue monty?
#7
Posted 23 August 2007 - 10:18 AM
I was gonna say the same David.
Although if you put the numbers into the equation in the front of the Vizard book it comes out in the 8 secs bracket. However, mine comes out at 11secs and there is no way it will ever go that fast!!
Dale,
What time do you think yours would run? Lockharts gulf racing one does it in eleven (titanium subframe) very light, so he says?? Also what do the busa powred one's do it in?
not had the nuts to try mine yet.
Hilty
#8
Posted 23 August 2007 - 11:11 AM
the yellow monte had warm tyres when i did the standing starts with it, we were on elvingtons concrete pad which i know is grippy stuff every run i did was sub 10 seconds and the best was 9.3
the trace from the data logging showed two tenths where i changed just tad too late and hit the rev limiter this spoils the accelaration by two tenths si in theory that day i could have done a 9.1 second quarter
ive spoken to sunoco this morning about the fuel we were running in the blue mointe and they tell me that the car will run very rich with their fuel in with no adjustments to the mapping we need to do more mapping tolean the car off no wonder it feltlike the choke was on
chris
#9
Posted 23 August 2007 - 05:00 PM
Did you take any more pics of the blue monty?
I got a couple
Zcars_Monte.jpg 482.06K 96 downloads
20070819_0648_1.JPG 120.86K 81 downloads
#10
Posted 23 August 2007 - 05:05 PM
I havent seen a busa one run yet that is in standard road trim, but Mark Rally might have some times for his....
Edited by R1minimagic, 23 August 2007 - 05:08 PM.
#11
Posted 23 August 2007 - 05:07 PM
#12
Posted 23 August 2007 - 05:11 PM
heared u bliping the accelerator in the pits/fireup lane oooh so nice
friend thought the waistgate sounds the same from a mitsubishi lancer evo 8...i just smiled and nodded because i dont know it just sounds nice!
#13
Posted 23 August 2007 - 05:48 PM
i spoke to a boffin at sunoco today and he lost me very quickly with oxygen particles attaching to things in the fuel???
i know your specialist subject is fuel chemistry and you would have understood basically i cocked up putting fuel in it that it wasnt mapped for
we will still go for some times for the monte as the run i did in 2nd gear the car hooked up very well just to be lost by me getting 5th instead of 3rd
i felt that it had more initial grip than the bike engined car and in theory its bigger bhp and torque should equate to better figures
how fast does mr vizards book think we can do it in?
chris
#14
Posted 23 August 2007 - 05:59 PM
For my car it comes out as 10.9 seconds which i dont think is possible!!
You can quite easily get octane up by blending the fuel yourself, just use some cellulose paint thinners which is basically toluene, xylenes and methanol. Of course with octane levels that high you will need to re-adjust the fueling or increase the boost a little to keep stoichiometry at around 14:1. You could always add a touch of nitrous which will nicely increase your oxygen level!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users