
Domino Cars
#1
Posted 19 March 2008 - 12:20 PM
The receivers have salvaged a selection of mould components, however there is not a complete set for any of the models. It appears that they have been destroyed and skipped.
Therefore, no bodyshells can be produced.
#2
Posted 19 March 2008 - 12:31 PM
Another part of mini history down the drain

#3
Posted 19 March 2008 - 12:33 PM
Seems such a waste of the moulds!
Another part of mini history down the drain
Its a huge waste
we had put a deal together to buy them in december, the recievers never knew!!!
there are few sections there, but no full set
#4
Posted 19 March 2008 - 12:35 PM
#5
Posted 19 March 2008 - 12:39 PM
Surely if the demand was that great they could be reproduced from a steel shell anyway?
lol, you tell bmw that
the domino was the ONLY shell that could be produced and had documentation to confirm that from rover.
#6
Posted 19 March 2008 - 12:45 PM
Surely if the demand was that great they could be reproduced from a steel shell anyway?
lol, you tell bmw that
the domino was the ONLY shell that could be produced and had documentation to confirm that from rover.
So would that now be a case of contacting them for the rights now they are not in existance? Also what with the block exemption issues etc can you not now produce them anyway?
#7
Posted 19 March 2008 - 01:39 PM
Body Stylist, have you looked into what agreements might exist regarding the Mini Cord bodyshell? That was a genuine, Rover badged original equipment GRP body so there must be some legal standing for it. Of course I'd guess if the moulds exist they are in South America somewhere so getting use of them would be tricky!
#8
Posted 19 March 2008 - 01:48 PM
i used to work for Rover and when they split from Unipart all there parts production went to Caterpillar so it could be worth looking into. I dont think they bought the rights to the original shape mini itself as rover still stands and the fact that the company was bought out surely it lies with the new owner? After all they will be the ones reposible for part supply.
#9
Posted 19 March 2008 - 01:51 PM
TMF thread
Should have checked, you have already replied to the thread today


Edited by Amy, 19 March 2008 - 01:52 PM.
#10
Posted 19 March 2008 - 01:58 PM
The Caterpillar parts link is due partly to Ford buying Land Rover but Caterpillar only handle supply chain for Mini parts they don't make them. Unipart still exists and makes most parts but they stopped shipping and supplying them because they were terrible at it and Rover dealers were not getting the parts they needed, this was something to do with Ford but I can't remember exactly how it all happened.
BMW own the trademark on the general shape of the Mini body, the names of the cars and models, all the valid patents and any other intellectual property. There is a list of what BMW owns in relation to the Mini in the FAQ section. How do you think they are able to cause so much hassle to Mini traders if they don't own everything?
Edited by Dan, 19 March 2008 - 02:00 PM.
#11
Posted 19 March 2008 - 02:11 PM
#12
Posted 19 March 2008 - 02:19 PM
I've heard there is a clause in the trademark agreement that says if you've been making something for 6 years without challenge, then you can't be touched in affect, because the trademark owner has taken too long to do anything about it?
Jammy iwqs about to come to that also. Also if it is the case that they hold all rights then how can this be made??
http://www.bmh-ltd.com/minishell.htm
These have never been part of the Rover group from what i understand and since it was originaly a BMH vehcle would they not own the rights to this??
#13
Posted 19 March 2008 - 02:24 PM
#14
Posted 19 March 2008 - 02:27 PM
#15
Posted 19 March 2008 - 02:30 PM
This is all really old news and I'm amazed how there is always someone who doubts it when it gets posted here. Please read the FAQ, that's why it's there.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users