Edited by Cian 'the pain' MPI, 14 June 2008 - 05:28 PM.

Further Mods For An Mpi
#1
Posted 14 June 2008 - 05:26 PM
#2
Posted 14 June 2008 - 05:59 PM
Rob
#3
Posted 14 June 2008 - 06:12 PM
why would you want to do this......... the only reason for change is that the engine I am building has WAY more BHP than standard..... if your engine dont need it your ECU wont make a blind bit of difference..... what the standard ECU does is keep the fuel mix right.... it doesnt 'make' more power. If you have bigger injectors they wont 'make' more power they just wont turn on for as long a time....so you get the same result.... for spending ....well my injector was about £160 new....and you have 2 of them..... If you dont have the other bits then changing ECU / injs will give you the same result as you have now..... or more problems to deal with.
Rob
Thanks rob AKA the voice of reason

#4
Posted 14 June 2008 - 06:47 PM
I would be surprised , given the amount of discussions about cam changes on this forum, if the amount of camshaft sales actually equally the amount of cam bearing sales.....or oil pump sales.... It has amazed me all these people talking about cam changes........ and if you spend ages doing a search you wont find many questions about changing gallery plugs.... or where to get them..... or what size tap you need if you go for changables....
Just my thoughts tho.....
Tell us what you have and we can all put our ideas forward as to how WE would take the next step.
Hope this helps

Rob
#5
Posted 14 June 2008 - 10:58 PM

There is no other alternative to the MPI ECU you are stuck with what you got.
As for tthe 52mm throttle body. This does nothing tto improve performance. Throttle response will improve, but you could do the same by stamping on tthe pedal a litle harder. All it does is casue the inlet tract to reach 100kpa sooner. I'll bet that at 50% throttle and low revs annd aboutt 70% throtttle at high revs you will be at 100kpa, so what does the exra 50% or 30% do? Nothing!
I keep saying this about the 52mm TB, as do Minispares, but no one seems to care

If you want power from the MPI, you are going to finnd it hard to get 90bhp. That would need the best cylinder head you cann get, a decent injection cam shaft properly ttimed for thee MPi, 1.5:1 rockers, Power boost pressure regulator and the Superchips Icon Race ignition module
Of all the engines, the MPI is the hardest to tune of them all, it has to do with the way it injects the fuel

#6
Posted 15 June 2008 - 10:52 AM
Edited by Cian 'the pain' MPI, 15 June 2008 - 10:54 AM.
#7
Posted 18 June 2008 - 07:04 PM
Bet it'd be a doddle for 'em!
#8
Posted 18 June 2008 - 11:08 PM
One thing I am a little concerned with is the differences in AFR between cylinders that still exists. Its probibly good enough for you not to notice when you drive, but surely has to be loosing you some bananas somewhere?
As of current, CANEMS is the only option of a programable unit for the MPI, all others wont come close. Some have tried and failed. Some are still trying.
If you want programable ecu on an MPi, the easiest way would be fit an SPi manifold, you'll still get good results and the emissions limits are still the same which does seem odd considering the expense rover went to to reduce tthese by developing the MPi sett up
#9
Posted 08 July 2008 - 09:06 AM
#10
Posted 08 July 2008 - 10:02 PM
From MED or Morspeed etc.if you try the search, youll find similar topics in the past! Infact great ones that go into detail on what is best for the MPI and how much you can get from it.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users