
Who's Watched This Documentry
#46
Posted 15 October 2008 - 08:35 PM
They did say that more conventional high rise wouldn't have faired any better.
Today their designing and building high rise sky scrapers with plane attacks in mind. Basically their building in all sorts of extra escape routes and extra strengthening.
911 was a real life test dummy on how these buildings would cope after such an attack and they stood up quite well. But it was the raging inferno that was their downfall.
#47
Posted 15 October 2008 - 09:03 PM
Ridiculous I know, but it's the only way to keep Michael Moore happy.
#48
Posted 15 October 2008 - 09:11 PM
He'd have frozen the centre core in the first Tower and then stopped the plane hitting the second.
Job done.
Or perhaps Spiderman could have saved them with his web? Ironically that was something he did in the first Spiderman movie (he saved them from a giant spider or something), but that scene got completely cut as 911 had only just occurred.
So perhaps Doctor Who could travel back in time and prevent it happening? No chance, he's not allowed to do things like that as it would upset the balance of the universe.
Okay I'll just get my coat.
Edited by taffy1967, 15 October 2008 - 09:12 PM.
#49
Posted 18 October 2008 - 07:57 AM
the planned sinking of Lusitania by bankers who had relations to the advisers of the president.
It benefits the bankers who would print money and loan at interest for the war.
What drove USA into WW2? -
provoking the Japanese to bomb pearl harbor my the president under indirect advisement from bankers.
who would again loan money at interest to the states. who also funded the nazi's by selling fuel to them.
what started the Vietnam War?-
A complete lie that Vietnamese pt boats attacked US destroyers
again, bankers.
War on Iraq-
now, is it possible that 911 was planned by the bankers? which drove the US into a trillion dollars of debt?
and now the bail out plan to borrow another 700 billion dollars at interest to "save" the economy?
don't forget the depression which the bankers created by selling margin loans, and calling them in, bankrupting people and crashing the markets so they could buy up corporations at pennies. kinda like the subprime mortgage loans and the dropping points like we have now.
The steps are just too similar and it is very scary what a few evil men could do with fear.
#50
Posted 18 October 2008 - 05:16 PM
You win the award for the post with the most inaccurate and total rubbish "facts" I have ever read in the History of Posts! Where in Gods name did you get your info? The voices in your head or someone totaly high on crack? Seriously..you need to read some books on History rather than ones written by muppet porn watching liberal media types that get a hard on from brainwashing the vulnerable and feeble minded.What drove USA into WW1? -
the planned sinking of Lusitania by bankers who had relations to the advisers of the president.
It benefits the bankers who would print money and loan at interest for the war.
What drove USA into WW2? -
provoking the Japanese to bomb pearl harbor my the president under indirect advisement from bankers.
who would again loan money at interest to the states. who also funded the nazi's by selling fuel to them.
what started the Vietnam War?-
A complete lie that Vietnamese pt boats attacked US destroyers
again, bankers.
War on Iraq-
now, is it possible that 911 was planned by the bankers? which drove the US into a trillion dollars of debt?
and now the bail out plan to borrow another 700 billion dollars at interest to "save" the economy?
don't forget the depression which the bankers created by selling margin loans, and calling them in, bankrupting people and crashing the markets so they could buy up corporations at pennies. kinda like the subprime mortgage loans and the dropping points like we have now.
The steps are just too similar and it is very scary what a few evil men could do with fear.
PLease seek immediate help or an education barring any help,because absolutely nothing you wrote has any factual info whatsoever. Whoever told you that needs a good chucking into a woodchipper.
#51
Posted 18 October 2008 - 06:46 PM
#52
Posted 18 October 2008 - 07:07 PM
Somebodys version of events, and the interpretation they want you to know.
I know your American, and will try to stand up for your fellow man, but that last response to Marco i find way below the belt. Ok its awful you lost someone so close in the aftermath, but still try to remember everyone on here are entitled to there own opinion. to suggest someone is on crack......................
As it happens i think Marco is spot on with what he said, does this mean i'm on crack too?
Perhaps your not happy because your starting to find a lot of englishmen are just about fed up with Americans now, and are starting to say so?
#53
Posted 18 October 2008 - 07:28 PM
Not exactly sure why you would be fed up with us? Don't recall having done anything to warrent distane other than being your closest ally on the global scene. Short of that I can't imagine why you would be sick of us? Before you answer ...please dont dredge up the George Bush issue or that we are all fat inbred circus monkeys that don't have a clue about the real world as we dont share a European view of anti patriotism or that we don't have a particular angle on the arts.Or this credit crunch thing....fa**y Mae backed loans by British and European Banks that gave loans out to people up to 150 times their yearly salary..fa**y mae should have never backed them but out of greed they did so they got what they deserved.Andy, what is history? isnt it exactly what it says? His Story
Somebodys version of events, and the interpretation they want you to know.
I know your American, and will try to stand up for your fellow man, but that last response to Marco i find way below the belt. Ok its awful you lost someone so close in the aftermath, but still try to remember everyone on here are entitled to there own opinion. to suggest someone is on crack......................
As it happens i think Marco is spot on with what he said, does this mean i'm on crack too?
Perhaps your not happy because your starting to find a lot of englishmen are just about fed up with Americans now, and are starting to say so?
I have complete and total respect for people who have the BAlls to post up an opinion...but things that are more based within the realm of fantasy and make believe and trying to play them off as Facts to shore up a strong base for an argument are lame at best. NOTHING posted by MArco is even remotely close to reality and it scares me that people can think like that....it's theroy like that from people that spread rubbish that make greater issues like the Holocaust for example ,become faded in fact due to conspiracy ramblings. 36% of the population believes that it either never happened or that it was greatly exagerated because of listing to complete inconsistancy like that.
Marco is a cool guy but I have to call him on the fact nothing in what he said was true...sorry. I don't think your on crack ..I would just question what it is in what was said that you could possibly agree with?
Again..it's fine to have an opinion and you are certainly entitled to one however....if you were to post up that it's ok to add water to your oil to top it up,then you would expect someone to jump in and say...maybe thats not right?
It has nothing to do with I'm an American...just saying that what was said is a total load.
Edited by landy andy, 18 October 2008 - 07:29 PM.
#54
Posted 18 October 2008 - 07:32 PM
Maybe.....maybe. Hey isnt this past your bed time? I thought you would tucked away into your gimp box for the night by now?Maybe he's just a ..............."Banker?!!"
#55
Posted 18 October 2008 - 07:48 PM
Nah, I've been man-flued up, gimp box is covered in snot!!Maybe.....maybe. Hey isnt this past your bed time? I thought you would tucked away into your gimp box for the night by now?Maybe he's just a ..............."Banker?!!"
#56
Posted 18 October 2008 - 07:53 PM
Firstly....I hope it actualy snot.Nah, I've been man-flued up, gimp box is covered in snot!!Maybe.....maybe. Hey isnt this past your bed time? I thought you would tucked away into your gimp box for the night by now?Maybe he's just a ..............."Banker?!!"
Secondly...regardless of what fluid it actualy is...thats not a pretty image....cheers.
#57
Posted 18 October 2008 - 07:58 PM
#58
Posted 18 October 2008 - 08:05 PM
Oh god....no pictures.I beg of you! I'm sure you will find another of me in the damn gimp box.........Hey, you can consider yourself lucky that I didn't post a picture!!
#59
Posted 26 October 2008 - 09:03 PM
#60
Posted 26 October 2008 - 09:18 PM
BUT...
No wonder the yanks wanted to ban the film (the documentry) its 100% facts no watered down commentry nothing just fascinating facts
It's 100% facts yeah, but biased facts. The guy who made it obviously is a 9/11 conspirer, which means when he finds anything to back up his beliefs he will make a song and dance about it.
There will be many facts which go against what he showed in the documentary, so I wouldn't take everything in it as "bible".

You could go on for years reading into all the different sorts of conspiracy theories and still not find out the facts, these conspiracy theorists often do more harm than good.
Edited by yorkshirechris, 26 October 2008 - 09:20 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users