Jump to content


Photo

Tap For Crank


  • Please log in to reply
162 replies to this topic

#121 Nightrain

Nightrain

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 976 posts

Posted 31 March 2009 - 09:35 AM

Any taps I get made will be a 2nd, I'm not sure a plug (3rd) would be able to cut a rolled over thread which usually happens when an incorrect puller is used.


Right first off simon 14tpi isn't whitworth fine !

Does that mean we can add using the incorrect boss in the end of the crank to protect the thread to you other sin of using the wrong tap to repair the thread guessworks ?

Think it's time for a list:
People who are wrong about this thread:
Calver whose been using a the wrong tap, Guessworks again been using the wrong tap, Simon@minispares, GraemeC, mra-minis, DaveRob what the hell did BSF come from, dklawson because he believed calver & Dan. Probably some more as well but the above are the main people.
If I've missed anyone out feel free to add you name lol

No point doing a list of people who have been correct in this post, or been using the correct tap. because there's only me on it.

#122 Jammy

Jammy

    Moved Into The Garage

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,397 posts

Posted 31 March 2009 - 09:47 AM

People who are wrong about this thread:
Calver whose been using a the wrong tap, Guessworks again been using the wrong tap, Simon@minispares, GraemeC, mra-minis, DaveRob what the hell did BSF come from, dklawson because he believed calver & Dan. Probably some more as well but the above are the main people.

;) "I'm not crazy, the WHOLE of the rest of the world is!!"

#123 [email protected]

[email protected]

    Minispares

  • Minispares
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,202 posts
  • Name: Simon Jackson
  • Location: Mini Mecca

Posted 31 March 2009 - 09:50 AM

http://www.conexmeta...fine-thread.htm

Yes, another link I know, but whitworth fine thread is 14tpi

BS 84:1956 Specification for parallel screw threads of Whitworth form

http://www.diracdelt...ine/source.html

Edited by [email protected], 31 March 2009 - 10:30 AM.


#124 GraemeC

GraemeC

    Crazy About Mini's

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,313 posts
  • Location: Carnforth

Posted 31 March 2009 - 09:55 AM

Never come across Whitworth Fine before - certainly not in any of my engineering guides. Whitworth is a coarse thread type under the British Standard family, BSW, BSF, BSCY, BSP, BSPT, BSB which have a 55 degree thread angle.
The UN range is the adopted American standard that uses a 60 degree thread angle.

It would be odd for the crank to be the only part of the car to use BS threads when the rest were UN (apart from odd small stuff that used BA).



Well it looks like many have been wrong for many years and like Dan says does bring into question the technical standard of some of the A series specialists.

However I am still on the side that Whitworth Fine is not a documented and standards accepted thread however some may have adopted the name. Whitworth was, afterall, a more commonly used reference than BS, especialy when it came to the spanners/sockets etc.for the thread (bit like may people wrongly describing UNx bolts by their spanner size).
In fact I would argue that BMC were wrong in saying it is a Whitworth form as it is BS form, of which Whitworth is also one. I would expect the correct name would be BSS (British Standard Special).

But then, what came first - presumably the Whitworth thread which was then adopted and then standardised as BS, otherwise BSW would simply by BSC(ourse) as with all the other standards based thread forms.


As you've brought this down to a name calling and c*ck jousting session - where in either of the above points (the only two I have previously made in this thread) was I wrong?

No-one is disputing you anymore that a Whitworth thread form was used. You've caused us to question what was widely accepted, go away and research it further and agree with your view, thoughts & sources of information. As such you have educated us all. Well done, consider your ego well and truely massaged.

You have not, and probably never will, convinced any of us that Whitworth Fine exists as a standards based thread. 5/8"x16tpi Whitworth form is a special, how people name it is purely down to each individual but calling it Whitworth Fine is misleading and not necessarily correct - Whitworth Special or British Standards Special makes much more sense.
As has been borne out in the various posts using Whitowrth Fine as a name will cause many to wrongly assume BSF is requried as that is the standard fine version of a Whitworth thread form.

Oh and in the middle of all that you've managed to turn the thread into a medium to have a further stab at Calver - didn't see that coming (much). I think many would prefer it if you would take that personal battle home with your bat. No-one sees him as perfect but he does offer some good advice, I'm sure Vizard made and publicised (spelling?! ;)) some mistakes along the way. None of these people claim to be the God of all things Mini - that said you do give a 'I'm Holier than thou' impression in most of your posts that is very grating, but I suppose being humble is difficult when you're tantamount to perfect eh?

#125 MRA

MRA

    Previously known as 'mra-minis.co.uk'.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,607 posts
  • Location: Due to move again....

Posted 31 March 2009 - 10:26 AM

GraemeC has hit the nail on the head.

However when you said "Holier than thou" was that a Whitworth fine or a Whitworth special hole !!! ;))

#126 DaveRob

DaveRob

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 703 posts

Posted 31 March 2009 - 10:31 AM

was that a Whitworth fine or a Whitworth special hole


;) LMAO


At the risk of repeating a previous post feel free to add to the list of PERTINANT questions to be answered then

Questions to be asked or answered ....for me anyways....

1. Are we all in agreemnt that the evidence points to the crank thread at both ends being 5/8th Whitworth form 16TPI

2. Can we source a tap to chase threads at reasonable cost in some sort of bulk buy deal..... Im guessing its going to be a plug or at worst 2nd tap as I cant see the point of a first tap, I wouldnt have thought anyone is going to cut a completly new thread.

3. Can Dan advise the responses re the suppliers thing please, when they materialise....... as you know Im particularly interested in the MED situation.

4. Any other business.


Thanks Rob

#127 Guess-Works.com

Guess-Works.com

    Gearbox Guru

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,838 posts
  • Local Club: Rugby Classic Mini Owners Club

Posted 31 March 2009 - 10:39 AM

1. Yes

2. Working on it

3. One for you Dan...

4. pass

#128 Nightrain

Nightrain

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 976 posts

Posted 31 March 2009 - 10:39 AM

Never come across Whitworth Fine before - certainly not in any of my engineering guides. Whitworth is a coarse thread type under the British Standard family, BSW, BSF, BSCY, BSP, BSPT, BSB which have a 55 degree thread angle.
The UN range is the adopted American standard that uses a 60 degree thread angle.

It would be odd for the crank to be the only part of the car to use BS threads when the rest were UN (apart from odd small stuff that used BA).



Well it looks like many have been wrong for many years and like Dan says does bring into question the technical standard of some of the A series specialists.

However I am still on the side that Whitworth Fine is not a documented and standards accepted thread however some may have adopted the name. Whitworth was, afterall, a more commonly used reference than BS, especialy when it came to the spanners/sockets etc.for the thread (bit like may people wrongly describing UNx bolts by their spanner size).
In fact I would argue that BMC were wrong in saying it is a Whitworth form as it is BS form, of which Whitworth is also one. I would expect the correct name would be BSS (British Standard Special).

But then, what came first - presumably the Whitworth thread which was then adopted and then standardised as BS, otherwise BSW would simply by BSC(ourse) as with all the other standards based thread forms.


As you've brought this down to a name calling and c*ck jousting session - where in either of the above points (the only two I have previously made in this thread) was I wrong?

No-one is disputing you anymore that a Whitworth thread form was used. You've caused us to question what was widely accepted, go away and research it further and agree with your view, thoughts & sources of information. As such you have educated us all. Well done, consider your ego well and truely massaged.

You have not, and probably never will, convinced any of us that Whitworth Fine exists as a standards based thread. 5/8"x16tpi Whitworth form is a special, how people name it is purely down to each individual but calling it Whitworth Fine is misleading and not necessarily correct - Whitworth Special or British Standards Special makes much more sense.
As has been borne out in the various posts using Whitowrth Fine as a name will cause many to wrongly assume BSF is requried as that is the standard fine version of a Whitworth thread form.

Oh and in the middle of all that you've managed to turn the thread into a medium to have a further stab at Calver - didn't see that coming (much). I think many would prefer it if you would take that personal battle home with your bat. No-one sees him as perfect but he does offer some good advice, I'm sure Vizard made and publicised (spelling?! ;)) some mistakes along the way. None of these people claim to be the God of all things Mini - that said you do give a 'I'm Holier than thou' impression in most of your posts that is very grating, but I suppose being humble is difficult when you're tantamount to perfect eh?


Got to love that response, guess your not upset then..........

Right if somebody brings up the name of a supposed mini expert and thinks that that would confirm that the thread is indeed a UNS. Then turns out to not be the correct information, should that not be pointed out, before more people waste money on the wrong tap ? Surly thats more important than a few bruised ego's ?

#129 DaveRob

DaveRob

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 703 posts

Posted 31 March 2009 - 10:45 AM

I have no ego to bruise......... move on.....

Ill wait for answers 3 and 4 then lol

Rob

Edited by DaveRob, 31 March 2009 - 10:46 AM.


#130 Guess-Works.com

Guess-Works.com

    Gearbox Guru

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,838 posts
  • Local Club: Rugby Classic Mini Owners Club

Posted 31 March 2009 - 10:56 AM

This is to anyone wanting to go and purchase, get made their own tap....

Ask for a...

5/8" 16TPI Whitworth Form tap

if you ask for a

5/8" Whitworth tap or 5/8" Whitworth Fine tap

You'll get the wrong one and fubar your crank.

#131 Nightrain

Nightrain

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 976 posts

Posted 31 March 2009 - 11:01 AM

Now we agree it's Whitworth and not UNS, what you got the price down too with a bulk purchase ?

#132 Guess-Works.com

Guess-Works.com

    Gearbox Guru

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,838 posts
  • Local Club: Rugby Classic Mini Owners Club

Posted 31 March 2009 - 11:04 AM

Now we agree it's Whitworth and not UNS, what you got the price down too with a bulk purchase ?


If you read back, we agreed that about 4 pages ago....

TOPIC PINNED & CLOSED.

PS, Dan you have the power to re-open to add comment, and leave open if you so desire.

When I have a final price on a 'group/bulk' buy I'll post a new topic.

#133 Ethel

Ethel

    ..is NOT a girl!

  • TMF Team
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,409 posts
  • Local Club: none

Posted 31 March 2009 - 11:23 AM

Is this an abuse of my mod powers, by responding where others can't? If it is I opologise.

People who are wrong about this thread:
Calver whose been using a the wrong tap, Guessworks again been using the wrong tap, Simon@minispares, GraemeC, mra-minis, DaveRob what the hell did BSF come from, dklawson because he believed calver & Dan. Probably some more as well but the above are the main people.
If I've missed anyone out feel free to add you name lol


I'll happily add my name to your list: I used my own reasoning to differentiate between two conflicting points of view and came to the conclusion it would be more likely that you could pass a Whitworth tap down UNS thread without cutting it than the other way round.

All you've done is repeat yourself and berate others who based their opinion on exactly the same kind of received wisdom as yourself.

It's Dan's efforts in researching the matter further and, particularly, DKLawson in using his professional expertise to illustrate how the 2 thread patterns relate to each other and prove to me that you can pass a UNS tap down the 5/8-16 Whitworth hole that has convinced me you were right. You should be thanking them, if anything.

I do appreciate you sticking to your guns, but it's communal effort and intelligent reasoning, by people who have been able to countenance the possibility that their opinion could be wrong, that's won the argument - it's matters like this where web forums prove their worth.

PM me a response if you think one is needed, and I'll readily post it in this topic

#134 Nightrain

Nightrain

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 976 posts

Posted 31 March 2009 - 11:34 AM

People who are wrong about this thread:
Calver whose been using a the wrong tap, Guessworks again been using the wrong tap, Simon@minispares, GraemeC, mra-minis, DaveRob what the hell did BSF come from, dklawson because he believed calver & Dan. Probably some more as well but the above are the main people.
If I've missed anyone out feel free to add you name lol


;)

#135 Dan

Dan

    On Sabbatical

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,354 posts

Posted 31 March 2009 - 11:43 AM

MED have replied with this:

All cranks and bolts are cut to this thread


Which doesn't help anything. That seems to me to mean that they think everything is cut to that profile because they think it is the right one. It could still easily be the case that their bolts are made off site to the correct profile and they just assume they know what that is. So that doesn't get us anywhere new, at least with Mini Spares thanks to the good work of Simon we know that all their products are correct. With MED we still don't know for sure. I'll try again with them once I've worked out a suitably polite way to inform them they are wrong that they will actually listen to. Nobody else has replied yet.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users