SP's and 10's
#1
Posted 14 September 2005 - 05:09 AM
#2
Posted 14 September 2005 - 12:38 PM
I (like most people) am not a fan of the look. Get some nice group 2 arches for your 10's, or if they're f*in wide, i.e. 7" and over, then miglia arches are nice (they can be cut down to whatever width you want..)
Sportspack arches are nice for 13" wheels, and that's about it.
#3
Posted 14 September 2005 - 12:40 PM
I'll see if I can find the pic, might take some time though!
#4
Posted 15 September 2005 - 06:38 PM
Attached Files
#5
Posted 16 September 2005 - 08:47 PM
#6
Posted 16 September 2005 - 09:18 PM
Why do you loose acceleration ?????????...................go for the 13's you may loose some acceleration but you make up for it in looks
#7
Posted 16 September 2005 - 09:50 PM
#8
Posted 16 September 2005 - 10:52 PM
Ok so 13s are 505mm in diameter and 1587mm circumference, 10s are 485mm in diameter and 1524mm in circumference so a difference of 20mm diameter and 53mm circumference. Therefore over a mile 13s turn 1014 times and 10s turn 1056 times. this means that two cars, one on 10s and one on 13s were to be driven down the road the for 1014 revolutions of the wheel, the 13s would be ahead by 64 meters. if the 10s final drive was 3.2:1 then the 13s would require a final drive of 3.33:1 to achieve the same acceleration( closest being 3.4:1)bigger wheels take longer to get the same momentom as smaller wheels as theres a bigger wheel to turn
The difference is not great. If you are that bothered about the tiny difference in acceleration drop down one FD size
Now no one has mentioed standard 12s. these are larger again in diameter by 3mm
So the statement that 13s are bad for acceleration is some what rubbish and some what true :nugget:
And before any one states that I am crossing over the metric and imperial units don't miles are used for distance fine but I am metric and how many people on here work in kilometers, apart from those on the continent :nugget:
#9
Posted 16 September 2005 - 11:07 PM
#10
Posted 17 September 2005 - 07:40 AM
and some one like speedy cables can sort out your speedo :smartass:
#11
Posted 17 September 2005 - 10:13 AM
#12
Posted 17 September 2005 - 11:56 AM
http://rcmoc.org/bit...uff/Ratios.html
And this
http://www.geocities...1286/Sp...o.htm
In relation to this
http://www.minispare...=1&ss=24|speedo
For all your final drive/ speedo needs :smartass:
#13
Posted 17 September 2005 - 01:33 PM
#14
Posted 18 September 2005 - 02:02 PM
They make you lose acceleration mostly due to the MUCH increased weight... the 2% or so that you lose from the rolling circumference is negligible!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users