Posted 17 August 2009 - 10:39 AM
'Blueprinting' means bringing the engine to the optimum build standard allowed by the manufacturer's 'blueprints', or design drawings to use the correct expression. I'm not suggesting opening up the inlet or exhaust tracts, altering the combustion chamber shape, just cleaning up the manufactured standard to that actually intended by the manufacturer, but not achieved due to manufacturing tolerances. For example, you can get some really quite good head castings with almost no valve seat mis-match. Others have a big valve-seat mis-match. As originally intended there should be no mis-match at all. If this mis-match is cleaned-up and if the head was removed and measured it would come up as standard. Similarly, the workshop manual says that as a service repair the head can be skimmed up to 0.025". You don't need to declare any service repairs as mods, even though they may very slightly increase performance. Boring a 1275 to 1310 cc will give about 2 to 3 bhp extra, but it's not a modification, it's a service repair.
It's similar to cam timing. Standard cams should be timed in at 110 deg ATDC, but production tolerances can vary this by quite a large amount. I just built a 1330 cc unit where the standard cam timimng came in at 9 deg retarded before correction. It is hardly a modification to correct this manufacturing error using an offset woodruff key, it is 'blueprinting'.
With regard to the exhaust system, it's not a mod. to fit an aftermarket pipe and box, so long as it conforms to the original in terms of size and fitting. If a centre-exit pipe is fitted, then, yes, it's a mod., but there is nothing to prevent the fitting of a non-OE unit. If that were the case then virtually every Mini that has ever had the exhaust replaced would be deemed 'modified'. If in doubt, tell the insurer that the exhaust pipe has been replaced with a non-BMC/BL/Rover unit of improved quality - any system other than the BMC/BL/Rover unit will be of improved quality, especially if it's stainless steel.