
Compression Ratio Of 8.8 To 1?
#1
Posted 01 May 2010 - 04:09 PM
So anybody know if that would be ok?
Thanks Iain.
#2
Posted 01 May 2010 - 04:16 PM
Im watching a 1275 engine of ebay to replace my 998 and just reading through the description an thought that the compression seemed a low number?
So anybody know if that would be ok?
Thanks Iain.
#3
Posted 01 May 2010 - 06:19 PM
Around 10:1 is good for performance, but then you really do need to use 97+ octane petrol.
#4
Posted 01 May 2010 - 06:34 PM
8.8:1 is a bit on the low side if you are looking for best performane. It's easy to increase it a bit by skimming the head.
Around 10:1 is good for performance, but then you really do need to use 97+ octane petrol.
i dont know if this is a dumb question but here goes,,,
why when you have high compression (like mine which is at about 10.4:1) do you need high octane petrol?
#5
Posted 01 May 2010 - 06:36 PM
currently im running 11.5:1 comp ratio, i use bp ultimate, expensive stuff! and octane booster to raise it a bit more.
Edited by samsernie, 01 May 2010 - 06:37 PM.
#6
Posted 01 May 2010 - 07:06 PM
#7
Posted 01 May 2010 - 07:11 PM

#8
Posted 01 May 2010 - 07:21 PM
i will be running 10.9-1 so will be using high octain n octain boaster, going to be a bit expensive i think
#9
Posted 01 May 2010 - 08:46 PM
#10
Posted 01 May 2010 - 09:00 PM
#11
Posted 01 May 2010 - 09:04 PM
BMC is right: the cylinders will draw in about the same charge but the high compression engine will squeeze it in to a smaller combustion chamber and burn it better.
#12
Posted 02 May 2010 - 02:46 PM
With over 11:1 a custom-built one an be necessary. I know it was with my 'S' when it went to 11.2:1. The Aldon 'Red' was short on mehanical advance by about 4 degrees and Aldon re-curved one with the necessary additional available advance. With the 'Red' set to optimum advance at 6400 rpm, it would not turn over on the starter when warm.
With the custom one it was and still is fantastic.
#13
Posted 02 May 2010 - 02:51 PM
Edited by samsernie, 02 May 2010 - 02:51 PM.
#14
Posted 02 May 2010 - 03:31 PM
I've been using standard 95 RON petrol for years, but Cooperman's comment - "Around 10:1 is good for performance, but then you really do need to use 97+ octane petrol" - made me think otherwise!
#15
Posted 02 May 2010 - 03:42 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users