
4wd Vtec Conversion....
#16
Posted 25 June 2010 - 10:41 PM
They do rears too - clicky which are slightly more than the Minisport ones but not by much,
JR
#17
Posted 26 June 2010 - 12:39 AM
#18
Posted 26 June 2010 - 01:13 AM
JR
#19
Posted 29 June 2010 - 04:03 PM
http://www.tirerack....U...&sort=Brand
Also been looking at these wheels....
#20
Posted 29 June 2010 - 04:11 PM
There's also some nice 195/55/14 Cut DOT approved slicks same rolling diameter...
Well your all scratching your heads at this point saying "Clive but there 22.7 inches tall way bigger than the 19.7 of a 175/50/13"
Yes I know, and the reason is I need a little more ground clearance for those winter months, and the front uprights will be pushed out further than normal to fit a ET30+ wheel.
The K series Honda is allot wider and if you look at the Minitec suspension for the K series motor the wishbones are effectively shorter to allow for the engine and box.
So I want to get the Wishbone lengths back to something a little longer and more stable.
Edited by F1 Mini, 29 June 2010 - 04:19 PM.
#21
Posted 29 June 2010 - 04:30 PM
I can Replicate that RC height even with bigger wheels to get back that Mini feel back. I'm presently CAD drawing the Original front suspension from the std Sub-frames I have, so I can work out what the std RC height is. Then I might even keep the RC heights the same front and rear.
Cad modeling is a great way to get things right before you start and I do now have my own CNC miller now so making parts myself not a problem..
#22
Posted 29 June 2010 - 04:36 PM
Attached Files
Edited by F1 Mini, 29 June 2010 - 04:38 PM.
#23
Posted 09 July 2010 - 07:07 PM
Been looking at a few vtec conversions and i think a K series Turbo hasn't been done yet?? so will be looking into if I can manipulate the firewall to fit a Turbo... Seems the early B series manifold sticks into the original firewall and people have had to cut out large sections to make it fit... Just got me thinking then is there room to fit a One off Exhaust manifold and a turbo mounted maybe above the gearbox to the side of the motor......
#24
Posted 18 July 2010 - 07:07 PM
Need new bearings but they be fine for the car. Am using the std Miata rear disc's, (225mm Solid). I already have from my last Mini project the Wilwood 4 pot caliper that have the Hand Brake attachments so will be fitting them....
#25
Posted 21 July 2010 - 03:52 PM
Was looking at all the fancy lightweight versions, but in the end I do want to get this car to the finished. So I have ordered new swivel hubs from MiniSprint new EN24 drive flanges and bearings ball joints and outer CV joints. I think the 4kgs I could have saved might not be as relevant if a I end up with 300-400 BHP. Plus the £400 saving would buy me a Turbo charger... so which would i prefer...
#26
Posted 21 July 2010 - 03:55 PM
http://www.dtafast.co.uk/S_80_PRO.htm
#27
Posted 28 July 2010 - 05:50 AM
#28
Posted 02 August 2010 - 07:54 PM
That's quite a difference in heights I can only think that the short 90" wheelbase and lightweight rear must kind of make the rear less important. For example my Midengined car has front and rear RC heights only 50mm difference.
I would like to keep the ride height std or even lower it maybe to 4", but I want this to be a all year round car and winters here can be bad with snow. So I'm going to raise her slightly to about 6" clearance. The bigger wheels (22.7" Dia over the normal 175/50 of 19.9") will kind of hide the taller height and with the CAD simulation I've done seems I could even keep the original Steering rack and mounts, just fit longer Track rods, as the Mazda wheels have a -38mm offset compared to the std +7 of a normal 13x7, So the width of the car will not change but the hub to hub width will be wider and so will the wishbones...
#29
Posted 03 August 2010 - 11:22 AM
#30
Posted 04 August 2010 - 06:06 AM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users