
New Engine Build, 1380, But What Cam?
#1
Posted 18 March 2012 - 07:15 PM
i have got/will be getting
1380 Engine Kit
AE Powermax 20659KR 73.5mm pistons
1275 A Series crank 12G1505 EN16 Tuftrided ground 10 / 10
A+ Rods
Glacier Vandervell bearings VPR91306 + 0.010"
my mate has a standard 1275 short engine i can have for the block, and i will probably use the same company to do the machining as i have used in the past. i also have a choice of 2 similar "stage 3" heads, one of which is as new.
my question is, what cam do you think i should use? my brother used this same spec with a 276 cam and 1.5 roller rockers to good results. and i could be tempted to go the same way as i have a set of the same rockers already.
or would i be better getting a 286 and using standard rockers (plus i can sell the rockers to off set the cost)
or what cam do you lot recomend?
the car is used daily, but i only travel a very short distance to work, and dont have to sit in much traffic. however i am a spirited driver, and will be using the car for as many track days as i can fit in.
#2
Posted 18 March 2012 - 07:19 PM
i used a morspeed PH3 in my last one, it seemed ok with good power. wasnt too lumpy etc.
used a 286 in a 1330 too and that was good, bigger CC seems to iron out the lumpiness abit.
#3
Posted 18 March 2012 - 07:34 PM
#4
Posted 18 March 2012 - 08:26 PM
Oh and for the record, consider an offset bored 1330 engine, this way you still have 1360 and 1380 left on further rebuilds.
AC
Edited by ACDodd, 18 March 2012 - 08:27 PM.
#5
Posted 18 March 2012 - 09:03 PM
My mates 1380 rally car has a Med rally cam and is not nice as a road car, but goes well from 3500...I would guess its a 310 profile but am not really sure..
Oh, and I also think 1330 is a good choice...
Edited by AndyMiniMad., 18 March 2012 - 09:04 PM.
#6
Posted 18 March 2012 - 09:19 PM
as i stated earlier, it is a daily driver, but i dont cover a huge distance to get to work, i am willing to compromise a little on the idle to get something like the result i want, but obviousy i dont want it to be horrid to drive when not on full song.
as for emmisions, its a 74 so im really not worried about them as its not tested for an mot.
i am quite interested by a 286 cam, and not using my roller rockers, do you guys have an opinion on this? i am concerned it may be too lumpy at idle, and i will have to ring its neck to get the peak power. i would like to keep peak revs to 6500rpm really.
#7
Posted 18 March 2012 - 09:24 PM
http://www.mlmotorsp...id=86&Itemid=30
If you want more upto date info, pm me you email and I'll send you a mail shot.
AC
#8
Posted 18 March 2012 - 09:28 PM
#9
Posted 18 March 2012 - 09:29 PM
#10
Posted 18 March 2012 - 09:31 PM
AC
#11
Posted 18 March 2012 - 09:33 PM
i would go for the 276
even my mg metro cam is awsome and its like a 266
great for fast daily and still be good for track day
try and keep those revs under 6000 if you want your engine to last
#12
Posted 19 March 2012 - 04:44 AM
#13
Posted 19 March 2012 - 10:20 AM
#14
Posted 19 March 2012 - 11:11 AM
Camshaft evaluation is made by timing, duration and lift, compared to your engine capabilities (compression ratio, crank and stroke, valve size)
And you didnt state the most important thing, the cylinder head spec (valve size, porting, chamber volume ) which dictate the volumetric efficency for your engine.
TO fit a 286 because just people says it cool then you have 9,5 CR and you engine will be as powerfull as a lawnmowner.
As a baseline, with a 1380 not revving above 6.5k rpm I'd expect you might want a torquey engine.
In kent range that means 246, 256 and 266.
Dont bother with the 276 or the 286 in your case.
#15
Posted 19 March 2012 - 11:28 AM

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users