
Rolling Road
#16
Posted 28 October 2012 - 01:51 PM
If the reading is correct (baldwins rollers have been known to read higher than most newer set ups) then you could get a good few more if you get a nice maniflow manifold and match the head to it!!!
What cam are you running?
#17
Posted 28 October 2012 - 04:50 PM
100bhp with a swan neck weber manifold...
If the reading is correct (baldwins rollers have been known to read higher than most newer set ups) then you could get a good few more if you get a nice maniflow manifold and match the head to it!!!
Explain? im a complete newbie to be honest. ive got my car booked in on friday to look at the exhaust. The head has STG 3 stamp on it, ill have to look through the invoices
#18
Posted 28 October 2012 - 05:42 PM
if you get a weber box let into the bulkhead and fitted a good 6' manifold, then you would get better power, responsiveness and torque, because of the much better flow.
#19
Posted 28 October 2012 - 06:18 PM
#20
Posted 28 October 2012 - 07:00 PM
http://www.the-ace.o...e-modification/
unless your one of the lucky people that rules don't apply to
#21
Posted 28 October 2012 - 07:09 PM


#22
Posted 28 October 2012 - 07:18 PM
unless your one of the lucky people that rules don't apply to
Brilliant!
#23
Posted 28 October 2012 - 07:55 PM
#24
Posted 28 October 2012 - 08:19 PM
#25
Posted 28 October 2012 - 08:28 PM

Maniflow all the way
#26
Posted 28 October 2012 - 08:31 PM
my race engine had 100 at the wheels
and was not realy driveable on the road i know
it was registered as a historic so could test drive it
legally
#27
Posted 29 October 2012 - 01:41 AM
also surely if your talking about a difference in measurement isnt it all relevant?
Update, so ive done a bit of digging, watched a video on youtube of a lad trying to get his mini up to 100bph at minisport. now the results show 100bph norm, engine and 70bhp "wheel" now im guessing the reading of 100bhp is the unit most commonly used when describing the engines power? for example a Works S when leaving JCG was sitting at 90BHP so when the power read by mine was a 100bhp this is the most common way of describing a cars power. any other figure is really just being obtuse?
Edited by WillRunci, 29 October 2012 - 02:09 AM.
#28
Posted 29 October 2012 - 07:37 AM
when peak power is measured the operator takes his foot of the accelerator and lets the rollers and engine slow down
this slow down sort of measures the transmission loses
the computer than adds the losses to the power at the wheels figure and you get a guesstimate power at the flywheel power
the operator then gives you this power as it's a bigger number and makes you feel better
also to make you feel even better and to make their rolling road sound better than the one down the road the operator can tweak the calibration of the rolling road so the readings given can be a bit high
it doesn't really matter what the power is (although it is handy down the pub) it's what the car is like to drive and the MPG these days that's important
p.s. you still haven't told us how your getting a MPI engine with a big webber carb through a MOT emissions test
Edited by Bungle, 29 October 2012 - 07:42 AM.
#29
Posted 29 October 2012 - 07:57 AM
i get the feeling there's some ill words against Baldwins accuracy? any evidence to back this up?
e.g. http://www.theminifo...15#entry2595268
Doesn't really matter, just makes for better pub talk numbers!
#30
Posted 29 October 2012 - 08:44 AM
It will still be dependant on the rolling road, but the wheel figure can be misleading.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users