305 replies to this topic

[iMurray]

There is no way a vtr will best a gti, stock, vws are better, outright. On build, speed, style, value.

But then that's just my opinion Jake:-)


Great stickers brother Noah!

[Noah]

There is no way a vtr will best a gti, stock, vws are better, outright. On build, speed, style, value.

But then that's just my opinion Jake:-)


Great stickers brother Noah!

Thanks.

I'm not up on my VW GTi stuff, but dad's 2.0FSi GT. is F-ing quick.

[Chance]

German>French

British rules!!!

Standard!!!!

Edited by Chance, 28 October 2012 - 12:04 AM.

[Noah]

German>French

British rules!!!

Standard!!!!

Except from when your at the side of the road broken down .

[minimaxie]

German>French

British rules!!!

Standard!!!!

Except from when your at the side of the road broken down .

Or on your driveway and the car wont start when you need to be at a show

[iMurray]

quick figures before we can get back to stickers...

Citroen Saxo 1.6i VTR:
Fuel consumption (urban) 26.9 mpg Fuel consumption (extra urban) 46.3 mpg Fuel consumption (combined) 36.7 mpg 0 - 62 mph 10.2 seconds Top speed 116 mph Cylinders 4 Valves 8 v Engine power 90 bhp Engine torque
100 lbs/ft

Volkswagen Polo GTi (6n2 model same year as vtr)

Fuel consumption (urban) 27.7 mpg Fuel consumption (extra urban) 51.4 mpg Fuel consumption (combined) 39.2 mpg 0 - 62 mph 8.7 seconds Top speed 127 mph Cylinders 4 Valves 16 v Engine power 125 bhp Engine torque 112 lbs/ft

Thanks to Noah for letting me steal his thread....

[iMurray]

Double post... i am ashamed...

Edited by iMurray, 28 October 2012 - 11:32 AM.

[Ryang556]

I still want the Run BMC sticker

[Jakeclubby]

quick figures before we can get back to stickers...

Citroen Saxo 1.6i VTR:
Fuel consumption (urban) 26.9 mpg Fuel consumption (extra urban) 46.3 mpg Fuel consumption (combined) 36.7 mpg 0 - 62 mph 10.2 seconds Top speed 116 mph Cylinders 4 Valves 8 v Engine power 90 bhp Engine torque
100 lbs/ft

Volkswagen Polo GTi (6n2 model same year as vtr)

Fuel consumption (urban) 27.7 mpg Fuel consumption (extra urban) 51.4 mpg Fuel consumption (combined) 39.2 mpg 0 - 62 mph 8.7 seconds Top speed 127 mph Cylinders 4 Valves 16 v Engine power 125 bhp Engine torque 112 lbs/ft

Thanks to Noah for letting me steal his thread....

You must first ask which year or version vtr mine is..... For example there was the mk1 and the mk2 or commonly known as phase 1 phase 2. .. Phase 1 was prefacelift this is the version you are stating above whilst i have the phase 2 which was made with 10 bhp more making it 99-100 also the phase 2 was never officially said but was known to be a bit lighter. This you can see by pushing any panel (its basically paper) and lots of plastic inside making it very light and powerful...... Dont get me wrong the vw is built 10 times better than a saxo but its much heavier

[Noah]

quick figures before we can get back to stickers...

Citroen Saxo 1.6i VTR:
Fuel consumption (urban) 26.9 mpg Fuel consumption (extra urban) 46.3 mpg Fuel consumption (combined) 36.7 mpg 0 - 62 mph 10.2 seconds Top speed 116 mph Cylinders 4 Valves 8 v Engine power 90 bhp Engine torque
100 lbs/ft

Volkswagen Polo GTi (6n2 model same year as vtr)

Fuel consumption (urban) 27.7 mpg Fuel consumption (extra urban) 51.4 mpg Fuel consumption (combined) 39.2 mpg 0 - 62 mph 8.7 seconds Top speed 127 mph Cylinders 4 Valves 16 v Engine power 125 bhp Engine torque 112 lbs/ft

Thanks to Noah for letting me steal his thread....

You must first ask which year or version vtr mine is..... For example there was the mk1 and the mk2 or commonly known as phase 1 phase 2. .. Phase 1 was prefacelift this is the version you are stating above whilst i have the phase 2 which was made with 10 bhp more making it 99-100 also the phase 2 was never officially said but was known to be a bit lighter. This you can see by pushing any panel (its basically paper) and lots of plastic inside making it very light and powerful...... Dont get me wrong the vw is built 10 times better than a saxo but its much heavier

Thread about stickers guys!

and Saxo may be quicker but your aforementioned paper thin panels are not very appealing, any way the Saxo is just a jumped up 106 GTi, the 106 always had better handeling, and it came from a company known for hot hatches.

So out of all of that we have learn't that all these cars a ******* and we should get minis.

Edited by Noah, 28 October 2012 - 12:18 PM.

[Jakeclubby]

Agreed

[Ryang556]

Yeah saxo's are chavvy and rubbish so no-one cares

[Jakeclubby]

RYAN!!! We dont speak fir ages and then this is the first thing you say to me?!?!?

[Jakeclubby]

RYAN!!! We dont speak fir ages and then this is the first thing you say to me?!?!?

Explain yourself!

[Noah]

Yeah saxo's are chavvy and sh*t so no-one cares

You sir, have just be PWNED. How do you feel?