
Fibreglass Flip Fronts
#1
Posted 08 June 2004 - 11:24 PM
Are they safe?
Good fit?
etc etc, just after some general views
#2
Posted 08 June 2004 - 11:26 PM
Siggy
#3
Posted 08 June 2004 - 11:27 PM
Would you prefer steel, or the non flip route?
#4
Posted 08 June 2004 - 11:32 PM
I like to have some metal between me and an object, ie car, wall, mountian.
The piont behind flip fronts is access, well it aint too bad on a Mini compared to modern cars and at the end of the day if you Mini is built right, it will work and not need constant playing with
Siggy
#5
Posted 08 June 2004 - 11:33 PM
#6
Posted 08 June 2004 - 11:38 PM
Siggy
PS Sandra I don't mean you, even though you can't fit in the seats in the Cubby
#7
Posted 09 June 2004 - 12:01 AM
#8
Posted 09 June 2004 - 04:31 AM
#9
Posted 09 June 2004 - 07:44 AM
#10
Posted 09 June 2004 - 07:45 AM
#11
Posted 10 June 2004 - 10:51 PM
The Mini was designed as a one-piece welded monocoque shell with the static and dynamic loads taken throughout the all-steel structure of the complete shell.
Cut away that steel at the front and who knows where the stress is taken out. I used to work on the design of aircraft structure, so I like to think I know a little about these things. The totally inadequate structures I have seen added with flip fronts are simply not good enough to take out 3/4-front impact crash-case loads.
I've been involved with Minis since 1961, but I would never, ever, fit a flip front as I don't want to get a nasty headache (or worse) when I make my next big mistake. The last big mistake was about 4 years ago when I 'roofed' my '64 Cooper 'S' in a Welsh forest (we were winning at the time). The full cage (FIA spec) saved the shell and all I needed was a roof panel and a bit of light panel straightening. No front end damage.
Stick with the steel as original.
#12
Posted 10 June 2004 - 10:55 PM
#13
Posted 11 June 2004 - 02:38 AM
p.s. As for aircraft dont they make plastic gliders? is the stealth bomber made of carbon fiber? some of the toughest matirials are synthetic
#14
Posted 11 June 2004 - 04:22 AM
but i would think its not necissarily about how strong the actualy material is
it is about where and what is connected to what. With the fiberglass flip fronts the front is hinged at the front and is no longer securely connected to anywhere on the car. Even the front connection to the car is weaker cus it is hinged. With a normal steel front end however. The fenders are attached directly to the frame of the car which is attached directly to the grill and that to the front of the car which then directly connects to the other fender. This in essence makes a box with a bottom a top a left, a right, a front, and a back. The only weak area is where the hood (bonnet) sits on top of this box
with a fiber front end there is no box made its connected only at the front and only with hinges.
I think that is where the strength is
the biggest thing to ask is the mini a body on chassis construction or is it like new economy cars with a chassis and body built into one. If its the second option.... then taking away the structural front end i imagine would have a huge effect. If its a body on chassis then your just taking away extra crunch material when someone hits you.... which here.... with SUV's that are 18 feet long i would want to keep.
#15
Posted 11 June 2004 - 07:13 AM
Body shells are designed as a deformable structure, that means that in an frontal impact it is designed to absorbe the impact starting with the wings, innner wings then bulkhead and so on.
Gliders are made of plastic, but there are designed correctly, not just moulded (sp?) from the front of a car.
Siggy
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users