
Fibreglass Flip Fronts
#31
Posted 17 June 2004 - 07:58 PM
#32
Posted 17 June 2004 - 08:00 PM
#33
Posted 17 June 2004 - 08:07 PM
#34
Posted 18 June 2004 - 11:09 PM
#35
Posted 18 June 2004 - 11:38 PM
Tastes like errmmmm S££e
Siggy
PS should we start a new thread or just!!!!!
#36
Posted 19 June 2004 - 07:03 AM
#37
Posted 21 June 2004 - 12:14 PM
#38
Posted 05 July 2004 - 10:37 PM
#39
Posted 05 July 2004 - 11:14 PM
Thanks
Alex.
#40
Posted 06 July 2004 - 12:32 AM
the other reason i chose to do this was to make engine access very easy for maintainace etc. i have added this picture to show the shut lines between the fibreglass and the a panal, quit good i think.
Attached Files
#41
Posted 06 July 2004 - 11:28 AM
Just wanted to add my tuppence worth on this one.
My husband fitted a steel flip front to Percy and added 1" square box tubing brace bars, which I think has added considerable strength to the front of my 24 year old Mini. The steel front was constructed using genuine panels and I like to think that it looks good.
On the access point of view - I think the flip front made changing the clutch a whole lot easier as the engine didn't have to come out, which I think in the majority of cases it has to..unless you've arms like a monkey!!

Cheers
Pippy
#42
Posted 06 July 2004 - 05:16 PM
The flip front bracing has not been properly designed to take out the possible impact loads.
How were the stress calculations done? Who did the stress calculations? Did the person doing the calculations have an engineering degree in structural engineering and the necessary primary load data to create a finite element model for calculation purposes?
Without this defined data how can anyone say that the strength is increased from the original?
The original is a monocoque construction where the complete bodyshell is designed and tested to take the static and dynamic loads imposed during all forms of normal driving.
Flip fronts are all guesswork and should, in my opinion, be banned as failing to meet the construction and use regulations.
#43
Posted 06 July 2004 - 07:34 PM
Just because the front end is sturdy with the bracing on is irrelevant to how it will be distribute the stress load of an impact.
I think that sums up the point that the 'against' people are making.
#44
Posted 06 July 2004 - 09:38 PM
#45
Posted 14 January 2012 - 03:59 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users