Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Question, Rollers or balls?


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#16 mambaman

mambaman

    Mini Mad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 162 posts

Posted 04 May 2006 - 03:56 PM

anything with discs on should have taper rollers, still not convinced they are better mind.

whats your vote with the replacements dave?

Both my 85 ritz and the 94rover had tapers all round, but the fronts on the 94 were non-original.

#17 icklemini

icklemini

    Up Into Fourth

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,982 posts
  • Location: Northampton

Posted 05 May 2006 - 09:50 AM

anything with discs on should have taper rollers, still not convinced they are better mind.

whats your vote with the replacements dave?

Both my 85 ritz and the 94rover had tapers all round, but the fronts on the 94 were non-original.


Have found balls to be stronger and longer lasting on all minis including race, rallycross, 13", etc.

there is a technical explanation for this that a friend of mine wrote (he *does* bearings for a living..) - he put it on one of the forums years ago (miniclassic).

TTFN,
Dave

#18 Jammy

Jammy

    Moved Into The Garage

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,397 posts

Posted 05 May 2006 - 11:28 AM

Would this be that topic?

#19 Grayedout

Grayedout

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 901 posts

Posted 05 May 2006 - 11:44 AM

Yup thats the one !!!!!!!!

#20 maph2

maph2

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,291 posts
  • Location: Warwick
  • Local Club: Poor Boys Warwick

Posted 05 May 2006 - 12:14 PM

read that topic and i'm convinced - balls it is! :proud:

#21 mambaman

mambaman

    Mini Mad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 162 posts

Posted 05 May 2006 - 05:26 PM

cheers dave, thought you would say that

#22 icklemini

icklemini

    Up Into Fourth

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,982 posts
  • Location: Northampton

Posted 09 May 2006 - 05:10 PM

Yes thats the one - Tim (who explained it all) enlightened me to it and has been proved right IME.

results may vary of course...

TTFN,
Dave

#23 Guess-Works.com

Guess-Works.com

    Gearbox Guru

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,838 posts
  • Local Club: Rugby Classic Mini Owners Club

Posted 09 May 2006 - 05:38 PM

I would like to stress (pardon the punn) the reference to Metro's using balls is not a like for like comparison. The offset on the metro wheel is the best part of an inch less than that of a mini, meaning the center of the wheel is almost directly above the bearings, and hence the loads placed on the bearings are at a completely different angle.

#24 mambaman

mambaman

    Mini Mad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 162 posts

Posted 10 May 2006 - 01:45 PM

i was more amazed at the free-wheeling speeds down a hill near me, i've seen a difference of 15mph between the two bearing sets. Though i have to admit, its not the only change on the car. Doubt it has much to do with the life of the bearings though.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users