Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Timing Chain Tensioner


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#16 KernowCooper

KernowCooper

    Sparkie

  • Mini Docs
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • Name: Dave
  • Location: The South West
  • Local Club: Kernow Mini Club

Posted 15 October 2013 - 07:45 PM

Watch what happens to a motorcycle chain, power on power off,  the sprockets move forward and back out of phase, its a lot more accurate with a tensioner.



#17 cradley-heathen

cradley-heathen

    Metro-Man

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,481 posts
  • Location: have a guess?
  • Local Club: spearmint rhino

Posted 15 October 2013 - 08:04 PM

i would always use a tensioner personally.

 

however i have had one fail, the thin metal part (i think its spring steel) ended up stabbing a hole through the side of the cover and causing one huge oil leak! that was on the way back from uttoxeter a few years ago.



#18 welshdan

welshdan

    Super Mini Mad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 643 posts
  • Local Club: ?

Posted 15 October 2013 - 09:10 PM

if you could get a tensioner for duplex gears I would fir one for sure. the issue is that using the simplex tensioner on a duplex chain, the pad will break up. as stated bmc/bl didn't fit them with their duplex chained engines

 

in reality I don't think that it makes a whole world of difference in the real world.

 

its down to preference. though after having a pad wear to basically nothing on one build I have built my engines without since without issues.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users